dabaldeagul

That's a really cool, creative and useful way to apply AI. Tja is for sharing

25, I wouldn't notice the difference but it is more eco friendly.

Or 26, because if I don't pay extra for the 26th seed, it would be economically irresponsible for me not to take the free sesame seed.

Ah that'd make sense

Interesting that that works haha. In the end it's still connecting to a USB C port.

Please speak English.

Seems like an overblown statement, they just shaved their head :(

NL?

Also note that 100km is the minimum height to be "in space", not the minimum height for achieving orbit.

That doesn't really mean anything. You could achieve an orbit at a lower altitude if you wanted to, it would decay faster, but you could do it. The 100km karman line is an arbitrary thing, there is no solid line where on one side you can orbit and on the other side you can't.

I agree; the comment I was replying to seemed to imply that there was a minimum height requirement, or height by itself equaled orbit. But that's just my interpretation of it.

Well this seems like a bad semantic argument to me.

Maybe it is, but personally I prefer to see the result 100% finished. I am very impressed by the booster catch, and the non-stop camera feed on Starship was awesome, but I would like to see a full mission before saying that they reached orbit. And to me, demonstrating capability usually means doing it.

So what you're saying is that SpaceX deliberatly doesn't let Starship orbit, to keep reentry predictable. Which is what [email protected] said; they don't actually orbit.

Also note that 100km is the minimum height to be "in space", not the minimum height for achieving orbit.

Finally, I disagree with the note that having "enough fuel" to reach orbit means they have demonstrated such capability; I believe they easily could achieve this, but they haven't actually demonstrated it yet.

You have the choice to not watch all of them at the same time

Google Asia released a video about a physical Gboard product which made me remember it is basically the equivalent of April 1st there. But on the other hand, Nintendo released this on the Dutch language channel too, so I don't know if this is real or not anymore...

Twitter wasn't profitable right? So most of the "value" is in the name of the product. Elon changed the name and added his signature to everything the platform was doing, completely changing the platform Twitter is. So yeah, I do get why 75% of the money is gone now.