cyclohexane

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Exiting cloud being useful seems to be a very narrow use case.

For one, you have to be at a large enough scale where buying and hosting your own infra is feasible and cheaper.

Second, you have to give up the ability to almost instantly scale up or provision hardware in response to traffic or other events. (which is very common at scale)

Maybe his use case happens to be that very narrow case, but this isn't something I would take as general advice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or turks. Or Moroccans. Or Africans.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Idk about OP, but from my experience, you can speak German perfectly correctly, but have an accent, and that will make your job search many times harder, because they know you're not "German". I highly doubt this is about skill.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Americans do a lot of stupid things, but they are most likely to be self critical in this space. I think this meme should talk about Western Europe instead, because they have many problems, but they are so often never willing to accept criticism. They're quick to call the US racist, but in my experience, Europe has so much racism it's crazy it's viewed as this anti racist place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure Godot will become a lot more popular. There are exceptions to the rule. But in general, FOSS isn't winning the software field. But I agree with you and sympathize.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

If AWS was open source, you wouldn't be protected from a similar incident. You're primarily using them for servers and infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Idc about open source purism personally. I'm okay with open source projects making it difficult for corporate users to make profit and contribute nothing back.

It's open source enough for me. The code is open, contributions are accepted, forking is doable. That's what matters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The US is quite open about money's involvement in politics. Search "Citizens United" as an example.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sadly it will never. The average consumer does not care to do their own research, and will always fall for options with a marketing budget, even when FOSS options are similar or better quality. Now consider that often times (not always), FOSS is not up to the same quality.

Disclaimer: I always use FOSS when I can, even when lower quality.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree it's the BSD license. That's what I mean. It's a license that places no restriction on corporate use without contribution.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Unfortunately not enough. It still allows corporate use with limited restrictions. Only derivative work that gets distributed must be open sourced, and even then, they can choose to provide source only to those requesting it in inconvenient ways (ex: come pick up the flash drive from our office).

For example, android does not require open sourcing, despite GPL'd Linux, but because it's not derivative work.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And yet it is still a prevalent idea in FOSS that open sourcing without restrictions on corporate use will karma back to you positively somehow.

Non-corporate FOSS should be way more popular.

view more: ‹ prev next ›