you are right, you can pay anyone to do any terrible thing that brings you pleasure, and you have no moral responsibility for this”
another strawman
you are right, you can pay anyone to do any terrible thing that brings you pleasure, and you have no moral responsibility for this”
another strawman
And yet here you are claiming that if people abstaining don't result in their profit going down, then abstaining does nothing.
i'm not discussing profit at all. i'm talking about emissions.
You were repeatedly wrongly making the claim that an individual’s decision to quit giving money to the factory farming industry should be what changes them from profitable to not. I
i never said that.
you weren't addressing the subject, you were attacking the individual. that's a personal attack.
that isn't the claim i made. in fact, its remarkably similar to the one you are making.
the only claim i've made is that your claim can't be evidenced.
back to the personal attacks.
An individual person starting or stopping to give money to an entire industry does not change the industry from being profitable or not.
talk about a straw man.
It is a very solipsistic view to think that one person’s purchases change an entire industry from being profitable or not.
do you know how i know that you don't know what solipsism is?
how can we test your theory? can you point on this graph to when you stopped eating factory farmed meat?
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-meat-production?facet=none
you have no idea who you are interacting with but you drop untagged gore right in your comments and accuse people who push back on your unevidenced position and irresponsible rhetoric of being addicts.
you are acting dangerously and you need to re-evaluate your entire approach.
real pot and kettle situation you've made here