The only virtue of a wasted vote is the personal satisfaction that you get out of it, and that personal satisfaction has no real world effect on politics unless you are voting for a visionary with overwhelmingly popular support. (i.e. you would know if one is in the race)
if i'm wasting my vote then i may as well not vote at all. but i'm going to vote and it's going to be for someone who won't sign off on genocide.
When I was younger I was one of those “enlightened centrists” who believed in things like the purity of my vote, but reality caught up with me eventually.
The only options are: status quo that doesn’t do the bare minimum against genocide, or an actual fascist who is literally promising to do more genocide.
i expect to have at least 4 names on my ballot. i don't need to pick one of your favorite teams.
nothing to do about it now. congress has continually eroded its own power in order to avoid hard decisions that might cost them their next election. the have concentrated almost all the power in the executive branch, and i don't see that changing. in fact, if they could create a department of impeachment and place it under the executive i think they would.
Conscientious objectors don't end wars, are they a wasted strategy too?
I don't consider it a strategy to end war, I consider it a personal conviction. I don't care about the efficacy: either it's the right thing to do, or it is not.
if i'm wasting my vote then i may as well not vote at all. but i'm going to vote and it's going to be for someone who won't sign off on genocide.