chris

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Most people don't want to pay for AI. So they are building stuff that costs a lot for a market that is not willing to pay for it. It is mostly a gimmick for most people.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how they can recover from that. They will get lawsuits from all around the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

In my opinion NAT is a hack that makes lot of things harder than they should be. STUN and TURN are services that are created because there is no easy way to connect two hosts between different NATs. UPnP for port forwarding is another. CG-NAT is even worse. I have heard of so many people having problems with it.

Breadcast is messy. It is like screaming into a room and waiting for an answer. Multicast lets the computer decide if it wants and needs to listen to a specific group message.

IPv4 didn't have cidr from the beginning. They only had classes. IPv6 was designed with complex routing and sub routing in mind.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

They never wanted to worry about address space size again. And this makes subnetting much easier. I have a /56 allocation so I could do 256 /64 subnets. I hope that at some point home routers will have the option for seperate subnets built in. This way you could easily have guest, IoT, work or whatever networks without NAT.

One thing you have to consider though is that the minimum network size that allows autoconf is /64 and that because of the privacy extension a device usually has 3-4 IPv6 adresses.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (5 children)

IPv6 changed some things. First and foremost it has a huge address space:

  • IPv4: 4294967296 (2^32)
  • IPv6: 340282366920938463463374607431768211456 (2^128)

Then they simplyfied some things:

  • Removed Broadcast in favor of Multicast and Anycast
  • Added autoconfiguration without a DHCP server
  • Better subnetting support

And much more

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

IPv6 traffic is globally steady at around 37%. So it isn't a majority by far.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 5 months ago (17 children)

The perpetual chicken egg problem of IPv6: many users don't have IPv6 because it's not worth it because everything is reachable via IPv4 anyways because IPv6 only service don't make sense because they will only reach a subset of users because many users don't have IPv6.....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Depending on your jurisdiction it is probably your responsibility to enforce your copyright. I can always just record your music off a streaming platform. You can attach a license to your song in funkwhale (see this). If you want DRM for your music then funkwhale is probably also not for your. You still have to enforce your self that nobody monetizes your works if you don't allow it. You can delete things from the fediverse if you know the source but I don't think funkwhale allows DRM protected music.

If you attach a license to your works that doesn't allow monetization and they monetize the app you can sue them. I doubt they will though. And they probably wouldn't be very successful because the app and the server are open source. You could just build the app without monetization. And someone probably would.

The upload and sharing copyrighted music probably falls into the hands of the instance admin. As with PeerTube it is probably not a good idea to have open signups. But everyone has to make sure that doesn't happen.

The fediverse is an open and very liberal space. If you want full control over your works it is probably not for you. No software with federation probably is. If you want and need to control over your works (which is legitimate) you need something with a tighter grip, maybe host the things yourself on your server with DRM. That doesn't mean it is bad for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I am unsure if I understand you correctly. Funkwhale is for you to publish music or other audio you make yourself. Not for your commercial music library. And the software itself is under the GNU AGPLv3. You can host the software yourself on your own server or you join an instance of someone else. Just like lemmy, mastodon or all the other fediverse projects.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (5 children)

What are you saying? This is an open source project that is connected to the fediverse. It aims to be something comparable to soundcloud where people can share their music. What about this is says monetization?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Only if you have enough starting capital to skirt through life without a worry.

view more: next ›