Future policies work like that. The ban won't have to be enforced, because it'll be irrelevant before it's in effect. UK stepping back won't affect the actual change. Only idiots would invest money in technology that'll be obsolete in the territory "everywhere worldwide (except UK)".
bstix
I doubt that password sharing is the reason for them losing subscribers, so they probably won't gain many subscribers by not allowing it. It might very well backfire.
(they're not)
Press left horn.
Reality is crazier than fiction.
The most noticeable example is the Berlin Wall: https://www.exberliner.com/books/eija-riitta-eklof-berliner-mauer-the-woman-who-married-the-berlin-wall/
Also he Eiffel tower: https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/us-woman-married-to-eiffel-tower-for-15-years-is-now-attracted-to-a-fence-5467885.html
Then this is as good a time as any to show them that bullying does not work.
The strike didn't fire 600 people. Ford fired 600 people and tried to blame it on the strike.
It's not complicated. It's just a really dumb move.
Ford said "It's not a lock out". Yeah.. tell me the difference then. They just don't want to acknowledge that they're even playing the game - or maybe they don't understand.
If they want to do layoffs in every department that is affected by the strikes they will shut down faster than the strikes could do it. They're literally helping the union shut down the company, except they'll make it more difficult for themselves to reopen once an agreement is done.
The UAW already announced that they'd do stand up strikes, which despite the new name is a good old strategy of moving the strikes to whatever area or department they want to shut down today.
With these two strategies up against each other, I think the outcome is already determined.
Ford can not win this by laying off people. It's not like the union will suddenly back down just because Ford says: "lOOk aT wHaT yOU mADE me dO!!11" while it hurt itself in the confusion.
They can change the terms, but if you don't sign the new terms then you have never accepted the new terms.
For some reason, companies think they can write anything into their terms and think it matters. It doesn't. Most contracts aren't worth the paper it's written on.
If those were the terms you signed, those are the terms that matter.
It's a meme. Dale Earnhardt (probably) didn't say tthat.
Yes. There's a map and list here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_fossil_fuel_vehicles