In the context of close relatives being very disturbed by what is made with the person's image, I really don't think legally allowing absolutely everyone to do as they please with it will help.
brsrklf
joined 1 year ago
Weird. The lack of TPM 2.0 never prevented the upgrade process in my case, but once I disabled the upgrade, it didn't come back (though I couldn't tell you exactly what worked for me, I googled that some time ago).
However, for a while now Windows Update has been telling me my PC didn't have the minimal requirements to execute Windows 11. Sure enough, PC health check app tells me it's just lacking TPM. Gee, maybe it would have helped to check that before trying back then...
Yeah, same for me.
Getting rid of the automated 11 upgrade was a pain already, took me months to finally find what was making it resurface all the time.
Thing is, I wasn't even opposed to it originally. It just didn't work and failed systematically. And my PC wasn't even supposed to support it, since I don't have TPM 2.0, so no idea why it even tried.
Now with all the reports of new ways to fuck with privacy I don't even see any reason to upgrade.
Apparently so.
I saw the source was Reuters, but didn't see it was unedited. I wonder what's the excuse for the dumb title then.
Of course the article sounds stupid, it's written by GPT too.
It's freaking MSN. Two weeks ago, they published an article describing a recently deceased basketball player as having become "useless" now.
That was a very "robot" point of view, I guess.
Less than a GB, yeah, I certainly hope so. Just imagine a ToS more than a billion character long.
Apparently King James Bible is around 3 million.
It's not really logic, and I don't think it's defending anything, it's just the definition of monetary worth.
For better or for worse, stuff is always as valuable as people consider it to be. Which may be related to how useful that stuff is, but often is not.
He denied that any of the deaths were “a result of a Neuralink implant”
Disturbing content ahead, stop there and don't get too far in the article if you mind that. I know it gave me discomfort.
One of them scratched its head until it dug out a connector and yanked it out. You know, natural cause of death.
Honestly, you show someone even 10/15 years ago what we can do with RL, computer vision, LLMs and they'd certainly call it AI.
Some people trying ELIZA back in the 60s attributed intelligence and even feelings to it. So yeah, turns out humans are rather easy to trick with good presentation.
My guess is it's not really trying to identify the person on the pic, just looking for anything looking like a human face, like any phone camera software would.
With the same pareidolia/non-human faces problems you'd get on those.
Edge has its annoying quirks, but it's a world better than anything IE and it's mostly OK. I wouldn't use it on anything that's mine, but for work where it's set as default browser it does the job (until I have to check something on Firefox).
Bing is still utter shite though. Bing for enterprise has that AI result crap taking a full screen and a half before the real search results start, and if you misclick anywhere it'll get right back to the AI results at the top, most of them being not even close to your query.
It flagged your program for being dissident propaganda.