brihuang95

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

huh, interesting. so from a security perspective is there any other concern with this protocol? at least they're not using a mac relay server like Nothing Chats was

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

precisely, since google makes most of its revenue from ads, this move shouldn't surprise anyone

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

people should write in their diaries more often

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

really looking forward to Dream Scenario since it's an A24 movie so you know it'll be fairly unique and weird, and it has Nic fuckin' Cage!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

whenever we have new technology, there will always be folks flinging shit on the walls to see what sticks. AI is no exception and you're most likely correct that not every problem needs an AI-powered solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Maybe One Tree Hill?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Most CW shows for sure

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

https://lifehacker.com/tech/nothing-phones-imessage

Not sure how accurate this is, but I saw this article yesterday and thought I'd share for awareness

 

Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn't "some sketchy cryptocurrency" linked to an "exit scam." A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is "blockchain in a very pure form," and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who's claiming it.

Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient's public key -- a long string of letters and numbers -- which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. "Maybe it's the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I'm somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key," he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a "man-in-the-middle attack," like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.

Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can't be altered. Yen realized that putting users' public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them -- and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. "In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging," Yen said.

Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don't think I'm going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago (16 children)

What are the more "trustworthy" email clients? Thunderbird still good?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Same here, no issues

[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Google in general doesn't give a flying fuck about your privacy

EDIT: actually, they do care so much about it being shared with them :P

 

The headline itself made this worth sharing

 

Oh boy, more enshittification

 

"Last November, it agreed to pay $391.5 million to settle similar complaints by 40 U.S. states. Then in January 2023, it agreed to pay a total of $29.5 million to settle two different lawsuits brought by Indiana and Washington, D.C.

Subsequently, in May 2023, the company settled with Washington state for $39.9 million for the same reasons. It's currently facing a location tracking lawsuit in the state of Texas."

Jesus Christ...

 

I've been using Brave for the past three or so years but I do know that Linux/privacy enthusiasts tend to swear by Firefox. Wanted to get people's thoughts on this topic to see if I should be making a potential switch. Thanks!

view more: next ›