boatswain

I absolutely agree that it can't create finished content of any particular value. For my D&D use case, its value is instead as a brainstorming tool; it can churn out enough ideas quickly enough that it's easy for me to find a couple of gems that I can polish up into something usable.

This is why my most frequent use of it is brainstorming scenarios for my D&D game: it's really good at making up random bullshit.

Growing up I remember hearing that red cars were the most expensive for insurance, as owners of red cars had the highest incidence of speeding and dangerous driving.

Life doesn't adhere to waterfall methodology: we don't have to do one first, and then the other. We can progressively disarm as we're addressing the problems you mentioned..

Not the person you're asking, but my general understanding is that different products would be required to be their own companies, so advertising, Android, and Chrome would all be separate businesses.

Put a pebble in your shoe.

Along with that, I'll add in "number" vs "amount":

• A shocking number of people get this wrong (countable)
• The amount of confusion about it is distressing (aggregate)

Ah interesting, thanks!

Interesting! Sounds like they may have changed things a few times, or maybe my co-worker's memory has some gaps.

A coworker of mine has worked with CrowdStrike in the past; I haven't. He said that the releases he was familiar with from them in the past were all staged into groups and customers were encouraged to test internally before applying them; not sure if this is a different product or what, but it seems like a big step backwards of what he's saying is right.

I do kind of wish the dogs were so sitting around playing poker instead of eating, though.

Hahaha:

if you continue to try { thisBullshit(); } you are going to catch (theseHands)