blusterydayve26

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that’s probably a better phrasing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

People weren’t using them ambiguously, drive manufactures picked a non-standard unit to lie with on their boxes, and then tricked courts into going along with their shit because it was the old case of money vs truth.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I’ll assume you’re being intentionally obtuse because no one could actually be that dumb.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I am not from the EU region, neither do I live in one

So, the GDPR doesn’t apply to you. So, you’re probably SOL?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

The good old, “If it’s not your source, it’s not your computer.”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Used to be, "the tragedy of the commons" didn't quite so literally mean an attack on the common resources.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's not very reassuring, we're still only one computer bug away from that situation.

Presumably she wasn't identified as a violent criminal because the facial recognition system didn't associate her duplicate with that particular crime. The system would be capable of associating any set of crimes with a face. It's not like you get a whole new face for each different possible crime. So, we're still one computer bug away from seeing that outcome.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It’s an extremely compelling product story full of market segmentation advertisers dream of!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

H100 isn’t $40, it’s $40,000. You’re making the Bloomberg Mistake: it costs $4,000,000,000 - four billion.

I can’t wait to see what clownshoes nonsense way he absolutely fucks this one up, but that’ll take a lot of liquidity he probably doesn’t have access to unless he gets the $45bn Tesla payout.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How in the fuck did you find that, and where is the rest of the text on the page?

https://libraryofbabel.info/bookmark.cgi?xruxssyjn.wudtc241

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That, finally, explains the pink sauce lady!

 

Moral Crumple Zones discusses how humans are used to absorb liability from automated systems.

With Tesla’s Autopilot and Full Self-Driving linked to hundreds of crashes, dozens of deaths getting traction, it’s time to remind everyone that Tesla’s design choice to disengage self-driving in the instant before impact is intentional to ensure the driver is in control during the moment of impact, even though self-driving disengaged way too late for the human to react.

In my opinion, they’re sacrificing both bystanders and customers to preserve immunity from liability.

view more: next ›