blenderdumbass

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Are you the same Blender Dumbass 2.0 ?

I am the same blenderdumbas ass in odysee.com/@blenderdumbass:f and as in blenderdumbass.org

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I bought a phone for something like $20 which is very simple. It has no vibration. It has 65 KB of onboard storage. And it is not a smartphone. I don't even take it with me most of the time, because I know that nobody will call me anyway, so why bother. I use it very rarely. The most usage I have from it is calling, flashlight and maybe as a clock once every so often, since I have many actual clocks.

On the computer I use GNU / Linux. And I have no complaints.

So I don't understand why even bother with a smartphone in the first place?

PS: I would love to try Pinephone or Librem5 though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

how and when you know it’s a necessity

I did the math actually. And it seems like mass surveillance will only be justified if homicide rates are higher than 20% ( if 1 out of 5 people die in murder ). And only if surveillance actually stops all the crime ( which it doesn't ) and only if there is nothing less problematic that could be used instead ( which there are plenty techniques, like normal regular investigation, where you ask people around on their own terms ). Basically the math says it isn't justified by an apocalyptic margin.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

As always, they use a mildly annoying problem and try to solve it with absolute apocalypse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

It's proprietary.

 

Mathematical prof that surveillance harms x 1K more than it could potentially help.