bleistift2

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“it is enabling it doesn’t stop distribution“

Norgur’s point is that you didn’t provide any reasoning why that should be the case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

your argument is implying that if somehow we allow them to use AI generated child porn that it will somehow stop them from seeking the real stuff out or is somehow “better.”There is literally no evidence that suggests that in the slightest.

Of course. How would you procure such evidence? Give a group of pedophiles access to AI generated content and check if they molest children significantly less than a control group?

Pedophilia is an illness. […] You really need to […] take a macro view of what you are arguing in favor of.

I’m not defending pedophilia. Given that access to pedophilia treatment and prevention of sexual abuse is often lacking, I was starting a discussion of whether AI-generated content might be part of the prevention of sexual abuse of minors. After all, there are similar programs for drug abusers. Take methadone substitution as an example. Or establishments that are called “Drückerstube” in German (a very lacking translation would be “injection rooms”) – clean rooms where drug addicts have access to clean utensils for consuming drugs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

pedophiles should receive treatment for that instead

In a world where many people cannot afford basic healthcare or – if they can afford it – where healthcare isn’t available in the required quantity, does your argument still hold?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

And what happens when they start making requests of real underage people?

That’s the whole point of my argument. They don’t need to make request for real people if they can get fake ones of equal quality. Your argument reads like “We can’t let people have meat. What if they start eating live cows?”

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (52 children)

Isn’t it a good thing for pedophiles to have an outlet for their desires that doesn’t involve harming children? Am I not seeing an obvious downside?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Germany we actually test people before we let them drive cars. If you’re from the US, this concept might be unfamiliar :D

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That’s the neat part: They don’t. At least I have never seen confusing signage/markings.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My old boss (at a sturtup with some ten ppl) loved to do this. When you’re done with your work, merge to master. Boss-man would then revert the commits if he didn’t like the result. Since the branches all were merged, no-one knew what was actually in prod. Fun times.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

in Europe, we have a hierarchy

This is definitely not true for all of Europe. In Germany, for instance, signs on roads have equal precedence to signs on poles.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

How about letting her hurt herself (slightly)? If she’s old enough to understand you, she’s old enough to learn that people who tell her not to do something mean well.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Humans are also the ones publicly shaming parents for not removing their toddlers from sabertooths’ mouths.

view more: ‹ prev next ›