b1tstremist0

This is not about difference of opinions. You're sending a very wrong message with that oversimplification. There is no such difference for Nazis.

And deplatforming don't always work the way we expect.

This is not about difference of opinion. You are sending a very wrong message with that oversimplification. There is no such difference for Nazis.

Deplatforming don't always work the way you expect.

Let me say it in another way, by silencing the Nazis, you are erasing their footprints, hence making it easier for them to evade serious attention and live peacefully in their own little bubble.

If I was an employer, I would never know one of my employee is a Nazi.

If I talk about benefits. For one, we can track an individual's history.

Edit: I assume you know how terrorism is still a thing, but I can say most likely you don't know why it is. That's the case with most people. Try to think about it.

This entirely depends on how limited your perspective is. A limited perspective leads to more negative actions and an open perspective leads to more affirmative actions. 'Organized Groups', who influence others to think like them and believe what they believe, are results of negation.

Monetization of such content is questionable for sure, but I'm affirmative about what he says about the propagation of such extreme views. Simply being unaware about such things won't make them go away. People should know who they are and why they are so we can deal with them better. There's alot we can do better but can't do because of limited awareness and our own negative attitude to deal with them.

I really liked Surface Duo, atleast its design. Microsoft can actually innovate on that and not end up like LG but they decided to give up.

Not just NGOs, many groups are also involved in information warefare. This is a result of Wikipedia's poor policies that favor profits more than its purpose.