assa123

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Hey, no need to be sarcastic! /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

By which author? I can't find the book

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I love Darknet Diaries. I want to recommend one in the same genre, Modem Mischief.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I would go even further and say that we should have it until we can be sure it will respect others' rights. All kind of rights, not only Copyright. Unlike Bing at the beginning, with all it's bullying and menaces, or Chatgpt regurgitating private information gathered from God knows where.

The problem with waiting is the arms race with other governments. I feel it's similar to fossil fuels, but all governments need to take the risk of being disadvantaged. Damned prisoner's dilemma.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that exactly what roofuskit said? Sorry to ask but, where's the lie?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

and that's why it should be illegal, the big "buy" button ahould have higher precedence over any "renting" claims in the ToS and any attempt of misrepresentation should be fined.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I hope that's the case here. The sad thing is that not having the rights to something doesn't stops you from filling a claim, even scammers fill DMCA claims over original content, the movie is already down from archive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

upvoted, but, wouldn't it be really cold days? as in, contrary to the trend of warming.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

private keys fit in a floppy disk, and their use range includes ransomware decryption and identity verification. In Mr. Robot, all 9-M could've been undone with a floppy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not all interested buyers are in the ad business, and governments can make payments in a way that is difficult to audit from a third party perspective, definitely not in any currency or a change in the balance sheet. I wish things where different but seems to me that paying won't protect me from them harvesting every bit they can.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Indeed very interesting. It is a fundamental principle of finance: Investors seek to maximize utility, but this is under the axiom of complete rationality. And even if that condition is met (which I doubt), the utility function of money is not concave at all levels, for example leftmost of the graph, before the price of food. I think that after some point, utility becomes flat and Musk is way beyond that point. Additionally he seems to be a risk loving investor, not a risk averse.

view more: next ›