that's only newer hardware that meets specific requirements.
ares35
i'll let you know once i 'leave'...
i actually would have to 'join' the site, first, though. and that ain't gonna happen.
not to worry, forced obsolescence will take care of that for you.
without a master password, firefox just uses a simple scheme it can reverse. if you use a master password, though, then that password is needed.
chromium browsers now use windows credentials, if you have no password on a local windows account, then none is needed to extract the passwords from the browser. .
$1200 at launch, three years of updates. no wonder we're burying the planet in e-waste and plastic.
regulations like transparency and user control only work when the ones with the data actually follow the laws.
"rotten ronnie's" was another, from the 80s. but probably only in the u.s.
the thing must phone home to check license status, and they were able to match your systems to the same entity via ip or network or something. but with a minimum buy of 100, i'd tell 'em to fuck off if the total seats using the pack was less than that, regardless of commercial/personal use status.
this is a very sensible alternative to actually going all-in on self-hosting mail, which is a total pain in the ass.
they are claiming that you have to be signed into chrome, the browser, in order to open an incognito window.
yea, it sounds a little crazy. i don't use chrome, so i can't confirm that's the case. i haven't run into any articles claiming this either, just this post and one other elsewhere awhile back that does.
that ship sailed about two decades ago.
"a large number of Plex users use the software in violation of its Terms of Service (section "Content and Acceptable Use", bullet items 1 and/or 6), therefore all users will henceforth be banned from using Plex."