arc

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Or when he died on his ass on SNL. Or when he appeared in a Rick & Morty episode and managed to kill it by his mere presence. He thinks he is edgy, funny and cool but he isn't. Instead he is awkward, unfunny, weird and deeply unpopular for being a dick.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It definitely seems like an irrelevant point. All car sheet steel arrives in rolls.

I'd be more concerned about how it is formed into panels, how resistant it is to corrosion, what tolerances parts have, how easy is it to replace parts, whether there are visible production flaws due to it being naked steel, and if construction techniques or material thickness makes it more dangerous to occupants or pedestrians in collisions.

I certainly won't be surprised if pictures start appearing in a year or two of cybertrucks that have been completely fucked by salt water corrosion, or heat warppage or other issues caused by their design.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Nah you tried to imply something not born out by reality and got downvoted for it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Twitter is filled with idiots who'll pronounce London/Paris/wherever is under Sharia law. Never seems to occur to them that this is very easy to fact check.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Elon was mulling pulling out of the EU and I really want this dumbass to follow through on that threat.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I live in Europe where trucks are fairly rare but you still see large SUVs, 4x4s and vans around. My own feeling is that certain classes of vehicles should be considered commercial for the purposes of insurance, taxation, VAT, inspection, tolls, permitted usage and everything else. The legislation already exists for commercial vehicles so extend it to these kind of vehicles.

So is someone must have a stupidly oversized vehicle purely for personal reasons they can enjoy all the bullshit and restrictions that goes with it. Doesn't stop them complying but making it more onerous to do it will take demand for these vehicles off the market entirely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yup. Not much of it survives in the code since it was mostly rewritten from scratch but I guess if you looked at the nspr (portable runtime) or nss (crypto) code that there are remnants of those early days still in there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There are still bits of XUL around but I believe the preference is to use HTML elements wherever possible and they've been stripping XUL elements out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The way Mozilla worked and Firefox still works is there is a cross platform front-end implemented in XUL which is XHTML, CSS and Javascript. The engine underneath is the same (Gecko) but the frontend app over the top is what the user sees and controls buttons, menus, functionality.

Firefox was basically a fork of Mozilla stripped of the not-browser stuff and a cleaned up UI. It proved popular as a prototype so it grew into its own thing and Mozilla suite was abandoned. There is still a Seamonkey project that keeps Mozilla suite alive but it's outside of the Mozilla foundation.

The reason it's faster is that Mozilla was an entire suite expressed as a lot of XUL so it impacted loading times. XUL also had this neat trick that you could overlay XUL over the top of other XUL so the mail app was injecting buttons, menus and whatnot into the browser and vice versa. This was cached but it still had to be loaded. In addition and probably just as impactful, was that Mozilla shipped as dynamic libraries (DLLs) and a relatively small EXE, so it took time to start. In Firefox, the number of DLLs was reduced with static linking so it was more efficient to load.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Erm yes it was But here is a more or less chronological ordering of getting to Firefox today.

  1. Netscape Navigator
  2. Netscape Communicator 4.x (a suite of email, browser, calendar, HTML composer)
  3. Netscape Communicator 5.0 is abandoned as a commercial product because engine is getting old and Microsoft is being anti-competitive
  4. Netscape open sources Netscape Communicator 5.0 as Mozilla with the proprietary bits & crypto stripped out. BTW Mozilla was the internal name of Netscape exposed in the user agent and easter eggs like about:mozilla
  5. Netscape / Mozilla starts NGLayout which is a rewrite of the HTML engine
  6. NGLayout becomes Gecko
  7. Mozilla suite is based on Gecko using extensible XUL architecture
  8. Netscape themed browser released based on Mozilla with proprietary AOL stuff like AIM client
  9. A bunch of other things happening at this point like versions of AOL, Compuserve using Gecko
  10. Microsoft pays AOL a huge amount of money to not use Gecko in AOL client and make a lawsuit go away
  11. AOL lays off most of the Netscape staff & tosses some money to get Mozilla Foundation going
  12. Mozilla foundation splits the browser into Firefox which doesn't use so much XUL in the browser but is still the Mozilla / Gecko code base. It proved popular because it was more focused and loaded a bit quicker.
  13. Mozilla foundation also splits email into Thunderbird along similar lines
  14. Firefox progresses to where it is today.

So yeah it's a continuation all the way back. I also worked at Netscape at the time so I got to see much of this transition.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Personally I've never left Firefox. Used to develop on it when it was still called Mozilla, and I'm happy it's still around. Privacy is a major strength of it compared to other browsers.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

From what I see Media Matters said ads were placed against antisemitic / racist posts and then Twitter confirmed it. So wtf is the lawsuit even about???? Twitter tried to cast it as "free speech" or that these ads were a fraction of their total but the reality is they happened. So all I see happening if Twitter goes ahead with a lawsuit is a) they get anti-SLAPPed back to where they were or b) they go to trial and get screwed by discovery and reality. In a way I hope they don't get the anti-SLAPP since discovery would kill them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›