anothermember

My parents would send me to school with peanut butter and Marmite sandwiches. Slightly annoying that just because there's a ready-mixed version that people are now acting like it's a new thing, but at least more people get to experience it.

All other pizzas are worse than pineapple on pizza.

Now I wonder if pineapple, beans, and sausage would work.

No milk for me, I don't think that's covered by the chart.

I really think that's a separate issue, which needs to be discussed as a completely separated issue. I agree ads by their nature are manipulative, they serve the website and the advertiser not the user. I think that once ads are non user-tracking then we can have a discussion about advertising ethics and deceptive advertising (online ads have always been terrible even before they were privacy invading) but you can't have that discussion when it's mixed in with privacy issues. Only once you take away the privacy issues then we can have the conversation about ad-pollution versus website revenue.

I really wish people would stop calling them adblockers too, they're wide-spectrum content blockers, and they're not blocking ads, they're blocking malicious ad-networks which is necessary for user security. Given the prevalence of online spyware it should be a basic feature built in to all web browsers.

It just gives spyware-promoting sites the ability to say "but you're hurting our revenue" which is a completely separate issue.

I find they're a pain to use and I only have one out of social pressure, and privacy or not I'm constantly confused on why they're so popular.

I just use a throwaway account and have the rule of not putting in any data that I don't want to be read - which is barely anything any way because I do all my computing on my Linux laptop. I figure if they're collecting location data and recording me then they're just associating it with "random guy x" because I've never given it anything else. I should look in to one of the de-Googled Android distributions but I have so little interest and energy in anything to do with it, if it could be made totally private I would still rarely use it.

Oh right, I was stupid, I see it now.

I don't get it...

Logseq is great, a bit of a learning curve but worth it.

Most people aren't professional musicians though.

I don't understand why people are so cynical about this, it seems like a harmless demonstration of the current state of the technology.

Essentially yes, I would give the person using AI to generate an original image the credit as the image's creator. I'm willing to bet that anything "good" AI generates is a result of many attempts and refinements and a human selecting the best result, and to me that makes it a human-driven creative process using a tool, the same as using a random number generator.

I'm deliberately not saying "copyrightable" because I don't personally believe that digital files should be copyrightable (since recognising a copyright of a number is insanity), but it should be copyrightable in a society that recognises number copyrights.