agitatedpotato

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Nothing like the heroes who write the uncut fast and furious movies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

https://www.out.com/film/2022/3/22/disneys-first-out-lgbtq-gay-characters#rebelltitem13

I thought seven was blowing it out of proportion so I looked it up, and I think I was wrong in my initial thought.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Basically just 4chan pretending to be a really racist SEO firm.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

A lot of phones already have the capability to recieve broadcast band FM, the type and electrical length of the antenna matters a lot less when you're just receiving signals.

[–] [email protected] 115 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The last Goth girl who I thought was gonna sacrifice me ended up just telling me she only liked me as a friend, not as a human sacrifice. Thats life I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

How am I the one not trying to have a discussion? You think simply because I don't agree with you it means there's no discussion? Then wouldn't you also not be trying to have a discussion? If you tell someone they are making things political, expect them to respond, you're talking about them. If you don't want to talk about politics just say you don't want to. You've yet to respond to those points but insist they mean the same thing, and then you say I'm the one trying not to have a discussion. Hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Again infering it isn't already and you wonder why people respond. At least when you said fuck off you actually said what you meant. Try that more often.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

People can only respond to the words on the screen, not the ones you wanted to say, if you ask someone a question expect an answer. I can't make it simpler.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Thats literally an attempted refutation of everything is inherently political. Its already political, no one you're talking to made it political, they just reminded you of something you tried to ignore. So again if you just dont want to talk about politics, just say that instead of trying to refute that pretty much everything is inherently political. Words have meaning, say what you mean, because implying that the person you're talking to is making thing political is different from saying 'hey im not trying to talk about politics' and it doesn't automatically mean the same thing as "Why do you make everything political", especially in forms of communication like text only. Hell, one of them is a question and the other is a statement, so why would anyone who doesn't want to talk about politics prompt someone with a question that in guaranteed to get an answer that's directly about politics?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Then they should say that instead of trying to refute that just about everything is political because just about everything is political.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Limiting how many positive yearly reviews managers are allowed to give out. Not M$ but glad it's finally in the news. The employees find out how the system works fast, no matter how secret they tried to keep it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›