admin

In the same way that the law doesn't prevent you from murdering someone, but just makes it illegal to do so.

I'm the opposite, actually. I like generative AI. But as a creator who shares his work with the public for their (non-commercial) enjoyment, I am not okay with a billionaire industry training their models on my content without my permission, and then use those models as a money machine.

Because even when some of the water has gotten out, you still go plug the dam.

The best moment was earlier. The second best moment is now.

Seeing as laws can't be applied retroactively, what would have been the alternative?

Interesting summary, although not really an unexpected result.

Side note: I like your username.

Nope, that's not what I'm arguing at all. I was just pointing out how the commenter above me was misrepresenting the judges reasoning.

Obviously people should get angry over this. But I do not have enough faith in social media to believe that anger will find a healthy outlet if left unmanaged.

But if you are asking for my opinion - I think the woman should be allowed to tell her story, as long as she doesn't encourage naming the perpetrators or does so herself. And, given the circumstances / if possible, disable public comments and reposting to discourage further harassment.

They're not taking it offline because they're denying those kids were bullies, but because they are now harassed themselves, but by the entire Internet.

Obviously the kids responsible for the suicide should face consequences for their actions. But mob justice isn't going to fix anything, except for letting a new round of bullies feel good about themselves.

Can you imagine the damage of one careless keyboard warrior digging up the wrong personal info, and then tend of thousands people harassing them? How many wrongs does it take to make a right?

So does that include running or even building/tuning a model yourself, or just sending money to a saas for api calls? The former would still be kinda interesting. The latter... That's just stupid AND boring.

As you can tell - basically deduced from context. I've never really seen the term zionist outside of xenofobic rants, so that's all I had to go on.

This is an economic editorial, not tech news though.

No.