admin

Counterpoint: we don't get much articles about human drivers crashing, because we're so used to it. That doesn't make it a good metric to consider their safety.

Edit: Having said that, this wasn't even an article. Just an unsourced headline with a photo. One should strongly consider the possibility of a selection bias at work here.

• "AI means there will be fewer people required to do the same amount of work"

• "this does not mean higher unemployment"

I think you left out a steep off reasoning there. At least, I don't follow.

Because lawsuits are expensive, even when you're not guilty.

I don't think they'd be stupid enough to lie about hiring a voice actress for a voice model when they didn't.

Wow, time goes that fast where you live? I'm posting this 15 minutes after you, so that's like 2 weeks for you.

Got any stock tips?

TLDR: "AI" is not always right, and does not fulfil all dreams you may have of it.

Agreed. Would have worked better if it said "tangled up". This is too much of a stretch.

Just doing a public service reminder.

Are you? Or did you just think the weird "digital" in the title justifies it being posted here.

The only thing this has to do with technology is that a fraction of the things in the article are said online.

I found an article about it that has some details, you might find it interesting.

Customers own their own Customer Data.

Okay, that's good.

Immediately after that:

Slack [...] will never identify any of our customers or individuals as the source of any of these improvements to any third party, other than to Slack’s affiliates or sub-processors.

You'd hope the owner would get a say in that.

They don't think that.

Nah, there's tons of features that slack has over irc. To start with inline media (images, audio, video), but most importantly lots of out of the box external integrations and webhooks.