No, it only affects vanilla apks where the dev implemented the check. For some reason the dev might forbid to run the app to users that side loaded the app instead of getting it from play store
Patched/modded apks are unaffected because the check is patched out
Yes but not as blatant as STINKY
Everyone with a smartphone would see STINKY and immediately get suspicious, while only techs would have noticed the hidden network and investigated on that
Pork sausage (wurst?) is way more tasty
I'd rather skip a meal if the only option was spam
They taste better
Spam is one of the grossest food i ever tried
Shareholders are demanding more time spent in app in average and this is what they pushed: if there's not enough content, dilute it with some shit
Who's her and how it's related to technology?
No AI???? And it's considered a new invention? Meh!
Luckily it's just an attempt to scam some dumb VCs
Login from an old phone, then once it's installed on the old phone with the same Google account, it will appear on the newer phone. Yes, it's stupid
i was wondering why would you choose such a stupid WiFi access point name, then I read that it was Elon musk that decided that the default starlink AP name has to be that stupid so people would change it
i don't know if this is serious or a joke
There's a way to revert it in w11?
At work i need to constantly switch users and even if it's a domain account, the placeholder for the m365 ads is still there. I need a extra click every time i need to logout