Wirlocke

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If he was that competent why would he resort to openly pumping and dumping meme coins in public just prior to this stunt.

He has some dangerous strings he can pull, but that doesn't make him a good puppet master.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure he gave an outlandish bid for Twitter to manipulate it's stock prices when he pulled put, but he was sued into following through.

I don't think he ever wanted to buy it, or at least he wanted to crash it's value to come back and buy it on the cheap.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

The people can, but companies still need some kind of income to exist. The owners/ceos will just golden parachute away from the corpse

In order to tangibly pay employees/rent/servers a company needs either profits, subsidies, or ~~a ponzi scheme~~ inflated stocks.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

I hate hate hate when people try to discredit a theory because "it's a theory not a fact" as if the label of "fact" exists on some kind of science ladder for an idea. "Facts" is a colloquial word like any other, it's not some special category above theories.

Moreover, the most tried and tested theories are facts. Science rarely just disproves an established theory outright. Einstein's General Relatively equations reduces into Newton's Laws of Motion in most situations. Newton's Laws of Motion weren't "wrong", it's just General Relatively is more specific and accurate.

The Scientific Method usually just builds on what already exists without claiming we were all unfactual for working with what we had.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Eeeeeh maybe not "CP settings"...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Theoretically we could slow down training and coast on fine-tuning existing models. Once the AI's trained they don't take that much energy to run.

Everyone was racing towards "bigger is better" because it worked up to GPT4, but word on the street is that raw training is giving diminishing returns so the massive spending on compute is just a waste now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ring ding ding, winner!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The most immaculate well researched pickles ever seen.

But I'm getting bored, I should learn how to write, or maybe draw, or maybe dance.

No I got it, I'll shift my focus to an obscure Github program I'm using to test a weird thought I had!

I'll finish this burger later...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What resonated with me is people calling LLMs and Stable Diffusion "copyright laundering". If copyright ever swung in AI's favor it would be super easy to train an AI on stuff you want to steal, add in some generic training, and now you have a "new" piece of art.

LLMs and Stable Diffusion are just compression algorithms for abstract patterns, only one level above data.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Huh, didn't know that! I mainly mentioned it for the fact that it was crammed into products that didn't need it, like fridges and toasters where it's usually seen as superfluous, much like AI.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (11 children)

I wonder if we'll start seeing these tech investor pump n' dump patterns faster collectively, given how many has happened in such a short amount of time already.

Crypto, Internet of Things, Self Driving Cars, NFTs, now AI.

It feels like the futurism sheen has started to waver. When everything's a major revolution inserted into every product, then isn't, it gets exhausting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I have an SSD for my OS, but a large HDD for my games. It really starts to show as textures take a long time to load in.

view more: next ›