WallEx

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (21 children)

Why? This is a very real possibility.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, its a tone deaf joke.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What a dumb take. And I do those myself, so I know one if I see one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I know that the impacts are VERY different depending where you stand, but treating someone differently because of their "race" (which scientifically doesn't even exist) is racism. There are more and less consequential forms of racism, but its all icky to me.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 6 months ago (10 children)

I am disgusted but not surprised.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Yeah, you might be right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah maybe they are just talking from there perspective, but its so assuming, it just strikes me the wrong way.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Ugh, i hate people that think only their view of the world is valid.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So they use the word often, because its often used by them? Pretty ass backwards, but also makes sense for sensationalist "journalism"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

"... Only work to lower carbon emissions" But thats exactly the point, that it is high emissions now.

view more: ‹ prev next ›