Altering the photo even further only makes it worse though ...
WallEx
joined 1 year ago
The price for Mozilla's dark web monitor plus has GOT to be a coincidence, its 8,99 ... https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/6/24062765/mozilla-monitor-plus-firefox-paid-subscription-privacy-data-broker-removal-requests
Wow, sounds amazing, big probs to you! Are you planning on releasing the model? Would be interested tbh :D
I didn't, I just focused on how it is today. I think it can become very big and threatening but also helpful, but that's just pure speculation at this point :)
Exactly. Im not saying its not impressive or even not useful, but one should understand the limitation. For example you can't reason with an llm in a sense that you could convince it of your reasoning. It will only respond how most people in the used dataset would have responded (obiously simplified)
They're predicting the next word without any concept of right or wrong, there is no intelligence there. And it shows the second they start hallucinating.
Some might be, but certainly not everyone. Religious people are also individuals
I dont have one, but its an important part of peoples lives, so i think about this stuff.
The point being, that i have less issues with that way of resolving conflicts between your believes and scientific facts.
There is no one religion and they sure don't handle conflicts with science the same way, so which one are you talking about?
For example, Buddhism in its core is accepting of change in the world and aims to adapt.
No I certainly don't have have all the answers, the people that think they do are a huge problem.
I can understand the need for an explanation, but I simply don't have that need, although I like to know how things work. But if we as humantiy don't know I don't think its so bad.
Yeah, if you try to change the facts because of your believe we have a problem. If your religion can adapt to new facts (or live besides them) I don't really care.
Enshitification of the photo