Waldemar_Firehammer

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Kreacher because it alerts for no reason and doesn't do a good job at the one thing it was made for.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right, I didn't realize the lawsuit had been thrown out. The fact remains the law is completely unenforceable without serious privacy violations.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's nothing like that in the US that I'm aware of, though some states have tried.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I actually went opposite on my Pixel 8. A matte tpu screen protector gives you a self-healing protective layer that feels like paper and doesn't have glare. A beautiful bright display with a high refresh that feels like a kindle.

[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's no way to enforce an age ban on anything Internet related without serious privacy violations.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

My post is objectively true for the year-over-year pricing. See my post edit for proof.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I had no idea they increased the price twice in the same year. That's even crazier if so.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See my post edit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Check my edit. I was billed $80 less than a year ago.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I paid $ 79.99 less than a year ago. If they hiked it from 80 to 110, then hiked it again in less than a year that makes their practice even worse. They saw no dip in users so they thought they could go back for another bend over the bar.

See my edited post to see proof.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If that's the case it's even worse. I paid 80 bucks less than a year ago. I

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fact that there are multiple people in this community that have commented that they are cancelling their sub shows the value of sharing this post. Not all pirates are pure plunderers. There's a good amount of us that pay for content that is appropriately valued to them.

 

Disney is raking its customers over the coals with a 75% price hike for their annual subscription (originally $80.) People wonder why piracy is on the rise.Multiple commenters are saying I'm off base about the 75% price increase. My payment less than a year ago was $79.99. Here's the proof.

view more: next ›