UnbalancedFox

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But aPpLe CaRe AbOuT pRiVaCy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Someone on that page commented:

"It was always open source. They just bought the company who created* and maintained, it, moved the devs over to their own fork and closed down the original, graciously allowing the wine team to maintain their own fork of the old code, as if they needed a permission, lol. It's a good PR move (also for Wine, mind you) but nothing else."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I had an account there with a proton email address and suddenly I couldn't log in anymore. After 6 months of calling, someone finally told me proton emails are blocked because they are not secure. So I changes it to a tutanota email

What a clusterf**k

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I thought I was eating an onion... Nope.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Omg. Calibri.. Didnt catch that the first time around lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

In essence: It makes it random. (Hence fingerprinting checkers find the ID uniqiue")

Although sometimes you need some features that interfere with it. I use the add-on "Toggle Resist fingerprinting" to easily toggle it off when I want a website to draw canvas (canva.com is a funny example lol) and then toggle it back when I'm done.

Some nice things, but it can interfere with some daily use cases: Timezone is changed to UTC. Canvas shows random data.

Nice rabbit hole read: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Fingerprinting

(Its like Wikipedia. You can't stop clicking on links to find out more xD)

EDIT: fingerprint.com probably use Cookies and/or localstorage so the ID is the same when refreshing, but Firefox have protection in place for cross-site tracking and cookie sandboxing, etc (I won’t pretend like I know how everything work), but those protections helps against that type of services from what I recall.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I finally made a Lemmy account just to comment on this 😅

When this option is active, of course your fingerprint is unique because of how it works.

Every time a website fingerprints you with this option turned on, firefox makes sure that the ID is as unique as possible, so no correlation can happen. 😊 Verify this by visiting that site two times and check the hash to make sure it change between the two requests.

EDIT: fingerprint.com probably use Cookies and/or localstorage so the ID is the same when refreshing, but Firefox have protection in place for cross-site tracking and cookie sandboxing, etc (I won’t pretend like I know how everything work), but those protections helps against that type of services from what I recall.