TurboHarbinger

Why does this tax exists? For taxing ads? Like for promoting a clothes brand?

Yes because never ever an user had abused their OS.

Newsflash honey: it's a fucking tool, it doesn't have feelings. It's your own choice to use it or not.

Man fuck these half baked parasocial analogies.

One thing doesn't exclude the other.

More random questions: "why does every game is considered a doom clone?"

20 years ago we also thought piracy was dying. Yet here we are.

Me: This new law is against fiction. Your example is for something that’s not fiction. Do you understand the difference?

This is what I mean by your logic. Do you understand the difference between fiction and reality?

I mean, you said that camera thing like it was some kind of mic drop lol

Because surveillance never has been an issue /s. Did you just read the last comment and ignore the rest? One is a real problem, the other is fiction. Do you understand the difference?

Personally I think the Justice system attempting to have a bit of foresight is a good thing

Sure man, let's make a law about something we know nothing about, what could go wrong.

Nice article, but it's more like reading stimulus reaction while reconstructing it in a form that's similar to the original. But it has flaws. Based on the recordings you can make out pretty much any existant song (or memorized recording) but not original thoughts. Everyone can remember the beats of a song, but also everyone makes word associations in different ways, depending on which concepts sticks.

Very cool for an interface tho. It would be possible to use it as base for composers, if it's possible to interpret original hummings, or beats (what would I know, I'm not a musician), which would require training.

But there is a catch

Continuing to probe musical perception is likely to be difficult because the brain areas that process it are hard to access without invasive methods.

nothing gets out on its own

You're wasting taxpayers money in fiction and pseudoscience. Every law needs at least one real example of something being done in bad faith or at least proven possible (even if the perpetrator fails at it).

The cameras was just a real example of invasion of privacy. By your logic maybe we need to make laws against time traveling ASAP, considering at any moment time travelers will be more relevant than ever.

You need to start making laws for things that really affects your life right now, instead of fictional maybes.

Man from earth (2007)

A low-money dvd production movie about a man telling his friends he has survived since the origins of humanity. Very thought provoking.

And Im telling you that is practically impossible to read your mind without committing other known already existing crimes. There is a rule already for it, it's called basic human rights.

When I say sci fi law, it's because it's fiction. This new law is against fiction. Your example is for something that's not fiction. Do you understand the difference? Do you think this politician forwarding this law understands it?

This is more akin to those old laws of banning all alcohol.

Want your privacy? Should force/convince your countries to ban cameras first*.

Lots of misconceptions here. Brain waves are just the communication between neurons. This is basically internal wiring, everyone is wired differently. Also nothing gets out of your brain on its own, except heat.

A tool like this can only measure regular patterns between humans and compare them. You will only get are interpretations of your brain status. It can't read your memories nor know if you're thinking about eating a burger. At most it will get a "you're hungry" alert. You can train it to be better at figuring you out (or to do other stuff, like controlling a robot), but you won't get more without a very invasive direct link to your brain (and more training). Which is more like torture at this point.

This new law is just promoting fear for something they don't even know if it's possible or not. Very sci fi law.

0 ads too, windows 11 last update. Lemmy circlejerk is pretty much this. These threads are either fake news or ragebait, and the comments are just uninformed/untested opinions.

That without saying that win11 ltsc exists now. At least is something to test.