Tregetour

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Always cut out the intermediaries.

(I'm glad this story was published. We may roll our eyes, but it's a contribution toward raising normie's consciousness, which is welcome.)

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

Users: Do you realize what Windows is subjecting us to? MS board of directors: Windows? We don't even use PCs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Bell curve meme:

Grug: A file on my computer (/Desktop/passwords.txt) Matty Midwit: Cloud connectivity! Phone numbers! Biometrics! Just install the app! Less than a cup coffee per month! Backed by FAGMAN^TM^! The monk: A file on my computer (KPXC)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Context is king. If there's vital/time-dependent correspondence you're waiting on, notifications can matter. But email in 2024 is pretty darn transactional, in which case a daily check is enough for most. Notifications for something suggest that I need to drop what I'm doing and attend to whatever arrived. That just doesn't apply for service provider marketing, purchase receipts, etc.

And then the opsec angle comes into play: https://www.axios.com/2023/12/06/apple-google-requests-push-notification-data

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Notifications are overrated. I turn them off for the bulk of apps.

Devote one or two small time windows each day for life admin. Outside those windows it shouldn't be seen or heard.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The purpose of the piece is to smear the notion of individual control and development of AI tools. It's known as 'running propaganda'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I'm happy with outgroup x being able to develop their own AIs, because that means I'm able to develop AIs too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Staggeringly naive, tbh. Your profession will be made obsolete as a self-sustaining for-profit enterprise either way. The difference is that the tooling can either be owned exclusively by megacorp, or it can be owned by people.

It's better to be a bard relying on the charity and small custom of others than a literal sharecropper fueling Universal's proprietary model for next to nothing. At least in the former case you're free.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

In Italy's case, it will be its long track record of poor governance combined with the close intertwining of media interests and political parties. Live sport is just about all these subscription broadcasters have left, so a vicious defense is to be expected.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

When the remux is 30gb and the 1080 encode is 23gb ✈️🏢🏢

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Then said tools were made a lot simpler with a lot less control over them

Which needs to be reversed if we're to remain free in Western democracies. Access to and control of computing - general purpose computing in particular - is practically a civil liberty now. I look at legislators in my own country, and I'd wager 50% of them don't understand this, 40% kind of grasp the problems but are apathetic, and 10% are on the enemies' payrolls.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Advertisers working in your native language cannot hijack your attention when foreign language videos are running. Subtitling facilitates that, and encourages site activity that differs from consumption, such as broadening one's horizons and being inquisitive about the real world.

view more: ‹ prev next ›