TheOakTree

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Nothing like a little McTear Gas in the morning

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago

24 thousand tracker calls in one minute.

That's impressively gross.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Ah-kansah, I would imagine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

You were given free boots?!?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I've been using detergent "sheets" which are easy to cut up and portion depending on load size. No plastics either!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who's Steve Jobs?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

The site you linked says YouTube pays "$0.0.00069 per view" lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Didn't Spotify join Epic's side in the Epic v Apple lawsuit over the app store?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Don't feel guilty. It is the normalization of expected behavior at a workplace that forces you to behave in a way that you do not want to.

It is their fault for fostering a space where people are not allowed to present as unhappy, tired, stressed out, or otherwise below neutral, even if said state doesn't impact the quality of your work or communication.

We build relationships all around us where we are willing to understand that just because someone is not-happy does not mean that they don't want to speak to you in good faith. We also typically understand that not everybody who seems gleeful has good intentions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The problem is that all of this requires infrastructure spending.

Agreed. This is spending that our country isn't willing to do, mostly because of what we already have (both in terms of infrastructure and in political influence). Personally, I hate this.

As for Cali's duck curve issue, desalination is a great idea, but expansion of renewables and storage should really come first. Keep in mind that the current Cali grid generates much less dirty power during the day, where solar covers a majority of demand. Should we divert that solar power to desalination, we would need to ramp up dirty power generation during the day, and we would continue to generate dirty power at night.

Even if you only get 30% of the power back with green hydrogen it is power you had too much of in the first place.

While I agree with you, we also have to consider what this would do at scale. The 70% of excess power that you lose here translates to wear on the solar panel systems that is never realized into power. That is, the systems will wear at the same rate, but the amount of power you can utilize over the lifespan of the systems is decreased. It's still a better solution than not implementing these at all, but I'd be wary as to how reluctant our society would be to the spending, especially if the ratio of cost to utilization(?) becomes skewed.

We've been perfectly fine wasting energy for over a century, I don't see why we should pearl clutch now.

Well, that's an issue in of itself. It'd be great if we could waste less power in conventional generation, but it'd be even better if we could match or even beat that with renewables. I hope we can reach a point where everyone can agree to implement renewables sooner than later, but I don't see dirty power's political influence allowing for changes until renewable is equal to or better than dirty power. Which sucks, but a lot about our political system sucks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Let’s add in the cost of batteries as their own thing

I don't know if this is a fair thing to do. Yes, we could charge it from any other source, but we aren't (intentionally) overgenerating power from sources like coal, gas, etc. Thus, the need for implementing that storage largely depends on renewables.

I also feel like factoring out the costs of storage implementation leaves more gaps for combustion generation supporters to criticize renewables. I would rather be honest about the upfront costs and instead emphasize the long term benefits of renewables, both in cost and cleanliness.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The problem right now is that we need to find better ways to turn renewable energy into stable, reliable power. The power production problem is highly dependent on balancing power generation and demand, and any excess energy must be stored, used, or wasted.

The main benefit of gas/coal/etc. is that we can (almost) always control the output to a close margin based off of demand projections, which are typically updated every 15 minutes. That being said, the drawbacks of using this form of generation are obvious and need to be addressed.

For renewables like solar and wind, we can't always predict the output, so in the larger scale of power balance, we need to supplement it with something that can make up for fluctuations in generation. In the current system, this is from conventional sources.

The goal is to implement a robust energy storage system, ideally one that can hold a huge amount of excess renewable power during the day (largely due to solar), and reliable output that power when it is needed (higher demand at night). I would love to see the day where our nation is fully powered by renewables, and I'm super happy to see that there have been pushes to build up renewables, but the target scenario relies on big advancements in storage.

I would suggest anyone who is interested in what I said to look up "california duck curve solar" for some reading on what challenges solar overgen presents in bright and sunny states.

All that being said... we can do it! I sincerely hope we reach a point where we can phase out dirty generation across the globe, but it will take a lot of time and effort.

source: taking several power systems courses as part of my EE degree

view more: ‹ prev next ›