Tetsuo

Obviously, this is awful but it's one report of one person over 10 years ago.

Also similar things happened in Canada recently:

https://apnews.com/article/canada-indigenous-women-sterilization-5a0ecfc3897ce4fc663281c40dc31f37

I think there is many things much worse that Israel did so bringing that up is kind of weird.

So that's a yes.

That's great but can you just answer this ?

Is it ok in your sense to kill civilians because they invaded your country ?

A really simple question.

No subtitles available for this video.

Besides your links are too generic, if you want to properly demonstrate your theory you will need to at least quote the relevant part and especially the parts about AI.

The simple fact that iMessage has 0 interoperability makes it much worse than everything else.

So I doubt RCS could be as bad except if they remove the ability to operate with other RCS clients. And even for Google and Samsung that would be extremely stupid.

I would say Switzerland.

They have great privacy laws and a culture of secrecy from their banking history.

They definitely would have an NSA equivalent but with far less reach I would think. They are a "neutral country" as I see it so they don't need such a strong foreign spy agency...

At the very least, the US would be one of worse choice possible for privacy that's for sure.

Keep in mind that the spying done by the NSA was fully legal there. They had this whole framework of laws to justify and authorize it.

I mean the NSA intercepting CISCO routers to bug them ?

That's a bold move that most countries couldn't do...

https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608141/snowden--the-nsa-planted-backdoors-in-cisco-products.html

It's still irrelevant but you have to be really dumb to agree to represent Trump as a lawyer..'

https://youtu.be/Lhy5Y8xVHS0?si=eTZrXuHCO_KdGL-5

I mean Rudy is still waiting to get paid for his lawyer fees by trump.

It was done in the past for larger US based businesses. I don't see why it couldn't be done with DDG.

Also, if your businesses is under a gag order the most logical thing to do is to act like nothing is happening. Because for DDG privacy IS the product. They don't have better results than Google they are trying to differentiate through privacy (or the appearance of privacy).

Also DDG is US based and has to submit to all the privacy invading American agencies. And they could be under a gag order nobody would ever know.

If privacy was a genuine concern for DDG they would have never based their business in the US.

You can create an account on DDG.

Even if you don't they can probably link your IP to search requests.

And even if they refuse, some agency could probably install their own software to track users.

I understand this looks like paranoia but again considering the invasion of privacy the NSA did in the past, it's not really far fetched.

My only concern with DDG is that they are US based and as far as I know they can be submitted to a gag order and forced to silently give private data to some agencies.

After the Snowden leaks this doesn't inspire much confidence in their ability to protect the privacy of their users.

I think they simply can't guarantee any privacy even if they have good intentions.

Weren't they talking about adding ADs right in VR ?

Seriously, what a nightmare. You try to escape reality playing a video game in immersion through VR and you get served ads ?

That added to privacy issues at Facebook, I would never touch that product.