Test_Tickles

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I don't currently have a computer powerful enough to host a top tier LLM like chatgpt4. If I can't even run it, I sure as shit could never continue to train it with new data. I often use chatgpt with my phone and the thought of doing either one is ridiculous.
There are ways to make money on open source outside of the open source item itself. Redhat has done just that with Linux.
An LLM is just software. No matter what algorithm, tool, or fairy magic was used to amalgamate the data it consumed, they all sucked in open source code and just like any other software that includes open source software, it should be subject to the licensing on the open source software, which pretty much means they should be open source themselves. Companies that want to make money off of AI trained on public data can make their money on the value they add, just like redhat.
The biggest issue I see right now is how to deal with AIs tendency to output data untransformed. Trademark and all those types of licenses are negated as long as the idea within is transformed, but it is really hard to argue transformation when the stupid thing is pooping out word for word quotes, but acting as if it is "new" and transformed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

You don't even have to be logged in, or even go to the same website. There are a number of companies that offer free analytics tools to websites. A completely innocent website that just wants to know how many people have visited their page might use a free people counting widget from Google, Facebook, or wherever. Now every time that webpage gets loaded by a browser so does that widget. The widget itself doesn't even have to report back to the original creators. If it includes something hosted by the original creators, then they can track the destination IP and browser tags.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

The real answer.
"Google it"... I wish... Kids these days have no idea how easy they have it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

This as much as anything else.
I work at a company that's looking to integrate AI into their product. The VP who started us down the AI road has made it clear that he doesn't see it being the reason that anyone would choose our product over a competitor's, but we also don't want to be seen as the only ones who don't have it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The late 1990s. The only upside to the saggy pants fad was that for a while you could buy extra long T-shirts just about anywhere.
For work shirts (polo shirts) I find that places like tjmaxx/Marshalls often have stuff for golfers. Golf shirts tend to run long.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Range anxiety is not just about a single trip. You are assuming that not only will we all be able to just charge whenever and wherever we park our cars, but that we'll never fail to do so. You also assume that only one person will be driving the car. If I forget to plug in my phone it's not a big deal. I can just plug it in on the way to work or bring a battery pack. And it is not uncommon for my kid to bring our car home on empty. And then of course there are broken charges and unreliable utilities. I can't even count on a reliable internet connection wherever I go and that can be supplied wirelessly. I have lived far enough out in the country before that I've had to deal with range anxiety in ICE vehicles. The threat of running out of gas before you can make it to a gas station is a very real and stressful issue. I can only imagine how much worse it is going to be when it takes more than just a gas can and a few minutes to get you going when you screw up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Fancy word people,
with your stupid tricky words.
Fuck your tricky words.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I think a lot of people are really bothered by it, but just don't understand why. They can sense the hate and bigotry layered into the scenario, but they can't really see past the the misandry in the responses to see just how truly awful the question is. And I think they cant just let it go without understanding it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Not just the layers, but a full history of every alteration they made from the first pixel to the last.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It is always the stuff that they mumble and handwave that you have to watch out for. The Moderation part is just to get everyone all talking about that. The scary part is the "other stuff". They probably want access to everyone's data so they can train their AI on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Drunk posting is sad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

you don't need to use it at the first place

view more: next ›