Wouldn't charging money for blue checks or adding a subscription leave them open to lawsuits? That's really the only reason I can think of, wanting to make money.
Sturgist
joined 2 years ago
A fairly large portion of governments globally
10 and ^15/16^ths sadly. It's being marketed as AI boosted to 12 though!
Hard agree. Only CEO I think might not be 10000000% a psychotic sociopath is the CEO of Signal.....but only cause she's not said anything I personally disagree with....and a bunch of things I do agree with. That's not exactly a great metric though.....
OP says they switched away from Proton in the first sentence.
Eh, it happens. If that was an honest attempt to troll....kids these days need to up their fucking game.
slightly less stupid
Which is why that's definitely not what's going to happen....
Big Brother Watch, Open Rights Group and Index on Censorship made a submission to the court, arguing against proceedings taking in place in secret and in favour of open justice. Today, the Tribunal has rejected the Home Office’s application, stating it did not accept “that the revelation of the bare details of the case would be damaging to the public interest or prejudicial to national security”.
Neither myself nor, I'm assuming, the person you're replying to wants to have the government with their grubby little fingers in our data.
What the person you're replying to was saying had literally nothing to do with what you asked. Has to do with the above. It's shocking that a UK court actually made a sane call. In this case, they decided that no, the government wasn't entitled to a closed case. That the proceedings would be open, and the details would be available to the public. Like in a functioning democracy.
taps nose
view more: next ›
....... obviously porn....you're missing the porn