Stoneykins

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I'm not here to argue the finer points, and in general I simply try to aim for the practical actions that lead to better circumstances. I agree with many of your points.

This lawsuit won't fix anything but it will slow down the progress of OpenAI and their ability to loot culture and content for all it's value. I see it as a foot in the door for less economically capable artists and such.

Lawsuits are not isolated incidents. The outcome of this will have far reaching impacts on the future of how people's work is treated in regards to AI and training data.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Noooooooooo. No.

Everyone and every organization has a bias. Even a "neutral" bias is a bias. Finding out which way their bias leans is good info to figure out.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

For someone who claimed to not be a fan of OpenAI, you sure do know all the fan arguments against regulation for AI.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Some people are missing the forest for the trees here

Having a businesses app on your phone is better regular advertising than anything they could ever pay for.

They just want an excuse to make you look at their logo and think about their business as regularly as possible

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I actually don't know anything about those. Were they put there while the soviet union still existed/built by the soviet union themselves, or were they put there later after by some fan of the soviet union? If the goal is to keep what is historical, regardless of political context, that would be the key distinction in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I didn't want to be more specific than my memory lol, thanks for the detail.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Most confederate statues are cheap crap bulk built all over the place sometime after the civil war as a sort of long term propaganda. They aren't historical, they are reputation management.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I think those are supposed to be the ends of a wooden frame sticking through hay?

But that is me trying to guess what they were going for. It looks more like a cookie lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I think they are arguing that using disney stuff as training data would be the infringement, and if the logo showed up in generated images, that would be proof they did that.

But I'm guessing because it is phrased weird if they meant that. Idk.

view more: ‹ prev next ›