SteveKLord

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

They can argue against the employer’s claim and prove they weren’t fired for cause. My former employer lied to unemployment and and it worked in my favor. Either way they can appeal a decision and should start consulting attorneys immediately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

"attracting" companies like Intel that are on the BDS boycott list is not really a good look for Linux.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

It’s all worth it if it means having this image grace the Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you are posting on walled-garden big tech site like Reddit, Instagram, Twitter / X, the site and therefore the company certainly owns your content and all the metadata attributed to it. You're the product. This is why most of us are here on the Fediverse where things are different. Maybe if it's your personal photo you took than you can make a copyright claim to some degree and download your data tediously but once it's on their network it's generally theirs to do as they please, whether that be sell to Google or any other advertiser or use on in-house advertising. Often without proper informed consent and not always legally. It's definitely a scam, I agree. Hopefully this exposes it more and brings more people to places on the Fediverse where there's no owner/seller/buyer of your data or anything else you contributed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

So it’s user generated content that is a product for Reddit to sell, like most big tech companies do, as I said.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

It's content that Reddit users generated which apparently is theirs to sell.

 

Google has struck a deal with Reddit that will allow the search engine maker to train its AI models on Reddit’s vast catalog of user-generated content, the two companies announced. Under the arrangement, Google will get access to Reddit’s Data API, which will help the company “better understand” content from the site.

The deal also provides Google with a valuable source of content it can use to train its AI models. “Google will now have efficient and structured access to fresher information, as well as enhanced signals that will help us better understand Reddit content and display, train on, and otherwise use it in the most accurate and relevant ways,” the company said in a statement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. They’ve referred to themselves as a fork of Signal but maybe a bit of an oversimplification

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I have Session. Given that it's a fork of Signal and more anonymous I'm inclined to trust it from a privacy standpoint but can't say I have the knowledge to really critique it's tech. People aren't really on there yet, at least nobody I know, so I don't have much use for it yet but I would if it catches on a bit more at some point.

 

These resources are designed for advocacy organizations, journalists, defense attorneys, policymakers, and members of the public who often are not getting the straight story from police representatives or the vendors marketing this equipment.

Whether it’s phone-based location tracking, ubiquitous video recording, biometric data collection, or police access to people’s smart devices, law enforcement agencies follow closely behind their counterparts in the military and intelligence services in acquiring privacy-invasive technologies and getting access to consumer data. Just as analog surveillance historically has been used as a tool for oppression, we must understand the threat posed by emerging technologies to successfully defend civil liberties and civil rights in the digital age.

The threats to privacy of these surveillance technologies is enormous, as law enforcement agencies at all levels of government use surveillance technologies to compile vast databases filled with our personal information or gain access to devices that can lay bare the intricacies of our daily lives. Use of these surveillance technologies can infringe on our constitutional rights, including to speak and associate freely under the First Amendment or be free from unlawful search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Law enforcement also tends to deploy surveillance technologies disproportionately against marginalized communities. These technologies are prone to abuse by rogue officers, and can be subject to error or vulnerability, causing damaging repercussions for those who interact with the criminal justice system.

The resources contained in this hub bring together years of research, litigation, and advocacy by EFF staff and our allies, and will continue to grow as we obtain more information.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

“Betrayed by this town / Let’s burn it all down “ might be the most relevant chorus of today’s music. It’ll be stuck in my head all night and would fit right in at most protests

view more: next ›