Skyhighatrist

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The phrase is well known and widely used in the UK, and I doubt anyone here would consider it an American phrase.

Yes, and it's used in many other places in the world that isn't America either. That doesn't change the fact that it is widely used in America. You may not have intended for your comment to come off as argumentative. But it did. You're the one that joined the conversation by explaining that it's not an American saying. It is a common saying in American English which is all the parent comment asserted.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“Raiining cats and dogs” is not of American origin.

Nobody said it was of American origin. You're putting words in the parent commenter's mouth and then choosing to argue against them. That's why people take issue with your comment. If you want to contribute to the conversation without coming off as argumentative then frame your point as adding to the conversation not as an argument against something that wasn't said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Both are also common in Canada. Edit, actually every one of the parent's idioms are common in Canada to varying degrees.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In Canadian "fucking the dog" means slacking off, especially at work. This is not the same as "Screw the pooch" which means to fuck something up big time.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

I got the impression that it wasn't exactly unprompted and that they had been being overwhelmed with take down requests. Like it or not, Lemmy instances do have to follow the laws of their local jurisdiction. Which means responding to take down requests when applicable. The post suggested that until they had tools to better manage that, they had to block them, but have unblocked them now which implies that they have those tools.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think they just ublocked the dbzero. Or at least I saw a post about it recently saying they've unblocked the piracy communities. I assume that's what you're referring to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The etymology suggests that originally we just called livestock cattle (i.e. these are My animals, my property), and the name was so ubiquitous that when it came time to give the specific species a name, it stuck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

What's wild to me is that humans decided to name a whole-ass species "Property".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What you've said is technically correct (the best kind of correct). But the word cattle is also used to refer to other similar animals such as Yak, Bison, Buffalo.

Merriam-Webster defines cattle as

: domesticated quadrupeds held as property or raised for use
specifically : bovine animals on a farm or ranch

Cambridge defines it as:

a group of animals that includes cows, buffalo, and bison, that are often kept for their milk or meat

And Oxford as:

cows and bulls that are kept as farm animals for their milk or meat

Wikipedia is more specific and defines it as:

Cattle or oxen (Bos taurus) are large, domesticated, bovid ungulates. They are prominent modern members of the subfamily Bovinae and the most widespread species of the genus Bos.

Not disputing your fact at all, just clarifying that words often have multiple meanings and meanings also change over time according to popular usage, so saying cattle means livestock isn't necessarily wrong, it's just not as precise as the technical definition. And the more people that use it that way the more correct it becomes. As I dove deeper into the topic, I'm seeing evidence that suggests that Cattle is also an American term that means Livestock, but is marked as archaic. Which honestly makes sense as the word's etymology is the following according to Merriam-Webster:

Middle English catel, cadel "property (whether real or personal), goods, treasure, livestock, (in plural cateles) possessions," borrowed from Anglo-French katil "property, goods, wealth," borrowed from medieval French (dialects of Picardy and French Flanders) catel, going back to Medieval Latin capitāle "movable property, riches," (in Anglo-Saxon law texts) "head of cattle," noun derivative from neuter of capitālis "of the head, chief, principal"

Anyway, good fact nonetheless.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I ended up googling cancel prime membership, and that led me to a page with a cancel button.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Many of the other comments on this post are misinformed and based on past versions of Godot. But Godot has recently had an update that has focused primarily on improving it's 3D support. I get the impression that many people looked into Godot version 3.x, and never bothered to look any further. It's true that it's not as mature as Unity, but that takes time and it will eventually get there. But people are unfairly disregarding, at the moment based on past versions being focused on excellent 2D support but mediocre 3D support.

view more: ‹ prev next ›