But wouldn't the husband be at fault here either way by conservative standards? It's infidelity.
SkyeStarfall
joined 1 year ago
Which makes the difference between the AIs and humans lower, likely increasing the significance of the result.
If you read into the study, they also include the pass rates for humans. It's higher than AIs, but still less than 75%
While I agree it's a relatively low percentage, not being sure and having people pick effectively randomly is still an interesting result.
The alternative would be for them to never say that gpt-4 is a human, not 50% of the time.
And at the same time believe in a million conspiracy theories in fields that they definitively are not experts in
Solar panels have also been used in space mission for a very long time. The first solar powered probe was Vanguard 1 in 1958
How many times do people need to get fucked over by privatized black box software before they realize that FOSS has a point?
You need to really specify what is meant by "AI" here. Chances are it's probably some form of smart traffic lights to improve traffic flow. Which is not all that special. It has nothing to do with LLMs
Because you clearly do not have any technical understanding of the field, or what machine learning even is, or how it can be useful, and the dozen of different things also called AI.
Yeah I don't get this, I've known people who have posted trans porn for years on twitter lmaoo
You really need to specify what you mean by "AI". AI has been used in tons of applications for decades. Do you mean LLMs? Because not all AI is LLMs.
To be fair, you need a license to drive cars