SkyeStarfall

I feel like this isn't surprising knowing about all the other stuff altman has done. Seems like yet another loss for the greater good in the name of profit.

It's so weird for titles to finally not be this immutable thing anymore coming from reddit. No more is it "whoops, I fucked up, guess this is it for all eternity now". It's very nice and needed.

But would that hold up in court?

This is pretty much fandom

Knowing about crumple zones makes you ask why you would even want a "stiff and solid" vehicle in the first place lmao.

The skull presumably represents the finality of such a decay, given that the end stage of human decay leaves behind a skeleton, something that does not exist in nucleons. [citation needed]

"We live in a meritocracy" btw

A major criticism people had of generative AI is that it was incapable of doing stuff like math, clearly showing it doesn't have any intelligence. Now it can do it, and it's still not impressive?

Show that AI to people 20 years ago and they would be amazed this is even possible. It keeps getting more advanced and people keep just dismissing it, possibly not realizing how impressive this shit and recent developments actually are?

Sure, it probably still doesn't have real intelligence.. but how will people be able to tell when something like this has? When it can reason in a similar way we can? It already can imitate reason plenty well.. and what is the difference? Is a 3-year old more intelligent? What about a 5-year old? If a 5-year old fails at reasoning in the same way an AI does, do we say it's not intelligent?

I feel like we are nearing the point where these generative AIs are getting more intelligent than the least intelligent humans, and what then? Will we dismiss the AI, or the humans?

With middle school math you can fairly straightforwardly do math all the way to linear algebra. Calculus requires a bit of a leap, but this still leaves a lot of the math world available.

"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway."

The problem is that such space stations are very complex to build and maintain, and can more easily catastrophically fail. It's certainly an option, but it may not be worth it.

Of course, all of this is speculation, but my point is mostly that if we don't have sufficiently advanced space construction capabilities, surface habitats and infrastructure on the moon may be preferable.

But you didn't have NASA level technology. There is a lot you can do to increase food production using less space if you're willing to pay the upfront and energy costs.