Seigest

For a second there I thought this was another buried Saddamn meme

Still shocked they kicked out Pluto over a doping scandal.

Give it all away anyway. Screw that genie, wealth hoarding jerk. At worst he kills you and you leave a saintly legacy.

Often me. I make tools/interactions for learning management systems. So the back end is a thid party I have no controll over. Just take the api and make the magic happen.

You need me to save data somewhere but don't want to buy server space? Sure we can cram that into places it's not ment to go within the system. It will slow things down and likly cause issues but it's free.

I found a bug once in our content that only affected Firefox. Old versions of articulate whouldnt start properly. Not somthing I could fix on my own as i meeded anyoher department. I brought it to the attention of the managers. They didn't want to fox it as apprently Google analytics showed only .4% of our user base was using Firefox. I manged to convince them its part of our user commitment to ensure that we work consistently across all browsers, but it was a pain.

Bragging is subjective.

Some take my bitching and moaning that I was up all night working on ____ because the project is a complete mess and they wanted it today as "bragging".

Its performance review time, i hate myself and rent is expensive.

My time management is poor because my project managers is even worse

Well you should wash you hands after wiping, before you touch your phone.

I saw a video on this recently. I think it was Wendover.

Though card counting is still possible many casinos have made it very difficult. Most methods require the counter knowing what is left in the deck.

Two methods are just using 3-5 decks and reshuffling the deck after eatch hand. This apprently stops all but the most insanely talented card counters. Some go further using a machine to shuffle the deck in a way players can't see.

Though it also mentions some players think this cheating for the house so it might not be done at every casino

I think surface level info is fine for an explainer video. That's kind if the point. He could do a little more to push people towards more detailed sources of info but he's not worse then most other explainer and he seems to be sourcing things decently.

I watch some of his stuff but I wouldn't blame anyone for choosing not to. The guys presentation of the research is just annoyingly pretentious and he seems to have a bit of an ego.

I get it his shtick is that he's a hipster journalist referring to your audiance as "guys". Its just not working for me.

My bad I assumed the email app my phone ce with was part of Android. Turns our it's Samsung. I'll delete the thread as it is I'm the wrong place. Some folks have given me advice regardless.