How would it work if, say, a website run out of California or even another country violated this law
Rolder
I dunno, some men just want to be on bottom and that’s an easy way to visualize it.
My go to method is, if someone brings up a political topic, I will very obviously try to change the topic. Otherwise I don’t engage.
Would it make you feel better if I cited a blog that takes lines from other sources out of context to change the message?
His sources ARE bad, is the issue. Conspiracy blogs is not what I would call worth reading lmao
Except your source is some site named worldaffairs.blog
Let’s just look that up… yep about what I expected, conspiracy drivel
A brief search on Kent State tells me that the President put together a Commission to figure out what exactly happened. Which then forced the National Guard to re-evaluate their tactics in such situations and led to them adopting non lethal tactics. Also there are plenty of memorials and the like up in that area.
As compared to Tiananmen Square where they censor the ever loving shit out of any mention of the incident.
Source is hexbear, opinion ignored
White settlers? Some brief searching tells me the origin was from Indian social media and then taken for use by Chinese citizens who disagree with him.
So you want to be the leftist equivalent of a nutjob conspiracy echo chamber? Weird.
Not sure why Winnie the poo is marked as racism when it specifically refers to one person and has nothing to do with that persons race
Don’t you worry, they would change their opinion on a dime of someone tried to prosecute Biden. We already know they don’t give a fuck about precedent.