Railcar8095

Elon will probably start taking preorders for Dyson spheres soon

Not only that, some items are in fucking literal jails, whole fenced rooms that requiere individual identificación to get in. Last I worked there, it was for expensive but small items with high risk of internal thieving, but with the price of this cards I believe they might apply

the maximum EU fine for that is high enough to bankrupt Apple. They won't do it.

I don't think Apple will remove side loaded apps at a massive scale, but let's be real. Apple is worth more than a trillion. If the EU fines them enough to bankrupt, they will just leave the EU and not pay the fine. US would go to war with the EU before they allow such amount of money to be transferred to the EU.

Somebody seems triggered.

It's a weird way of asking this. Of course it's going to do what's told, the alternative is that it, out of the blue, spits a battery design for no reason. If it were to somehow find a way to make batteries with less lithium in a way that never did before, isn't that an unexpected result using other approaches?

This is not general artificial intelligence, everything we have is narrow AI, focused on solving one specific problem, for identifying birds to understand instructions between drugs.

Not sure if there is much chance for effective carbon capture. The article states that this works for getting rid of very low concentrations of methane (so burning is not possible). That means that even with the methane 100% turned into carbon, we are talking about very small concentrations.

There probably were a lot of discussions and negotiations, but a lot of the public only sees Netflix going back to Twitter. I'm sure Elmo fans will promote this as Netflix having to bow down

I didn't know Apple did security updates after feature updates. I really hope my iPad pro first gen gets this, even if it's the last update it ever gets.

About EU forcing sideload, is it known how they have to implement? Only new devices? All supported devices?

Well, the problem is that every would need to have their own server with notifications waiting to be pulled (imagine your phone goes offline) and they need to be beefy enough to answer potentially thousands of requests per second. Almost impossible for small devs.

There's also additional battery need, as it's many calls and payloads, and if a server is slow it can affect all the other notifications. Plus more area of attack.

Not impossible, but I don't think it's the direction things will go.

Imagine you have 20 apps that can send receive notifications from remote (messaging apps, offers, updates...). That would require each app to be active in the background and pulling updates. That's a massive battery drain.

Instead, the apps send the notifications to Apple/Google, and the OS checks for all of the apps. The apps don't need to be awake (the OS could show the notification or wake the app) and there's only one service checking for the ml notifications.

It's a massive oversimplifying and probably I made some mistakes, but that's my understanding. Hopefully somebody can correct me.

One of the state laws that Tesla complains about is Cal. Veh. Code § 24011.5, which says that companies "shall not name any partial driving automation feature, or describe any partial driving automation feature in marketing materials, using language that implies or would otherwise lead a reasonable person to believe, that the feature allows the vehicle to function as an autonomous vehicle."

So Tesla accepts they mislead the customers but that's their constitutional right?

I would love for somebody to honestly defend/show a different interpretation. It sounds so bad I can't on my own understand how people still defend this.