PowerCrazy

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Probably the same number that used 3d-printed guns.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

This is basically how today's 3d printed guns work, but even still the gun isn't good for more then a few magazines afaik. So it's interesting as a way to create a gun that isn't serialized and the ATF can't trace, but it's not durable, and it still requires a good deal of precision engineering/cost, so its not feasible to print a truck-load and sell them for cheap.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I love technological non-solutions to social problems. They are the only thing the work better then passing more laws that say you can't murder people with guns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Turn off broadcast of the SSID

Don't do this. It provides zero security, and just reduces usability. Now you should call your SSID something non-identifiable. So instead of "$YourName Wifi" call it "pleasure chest" or something. Additionally do not set a ridiculous 64 character + special characters password, because again you are providing next to zero additional security, while hugely reducing usability.

Use a simple password scheme of 3-5 unrelated common words like from here: https://www.correcthorsebatterystaple.net/index.html for your wifi password.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A useful website to help contextualize how much power this is. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/gridmonitor/dashboard/electric_overview/US48/US48

Current US demand as of 20:30CST is ~560,000 Megawatt Hours. This facility can provide 8500megawatt hours over 100hours, or 85Megawatts/hr or about .015% of US electricity demand in an hour. At a cost of around ~$150million, that means to have enough storage for 10% of US demand, you would need ~670 of these facilities, or about $100 Billion.

Not too bad tbh. But of course this facility has a storage capacity of zero until it actually get's built (if it gets built).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I guess having a thick provisioned VM image on your laptop means that you are hiding something. Again if the evil government you are trying to hide something from doesn't need reasonableness as a reason to detain you, then who cares? No matter what you do you are rolling the dice every time you interact with them.

Which is of course similar to the US today, so if I needed to hide something from them I'd make sure that once i'm legally compelled to give my password they at the very least wouldn't have what they are looking for, since there is no way I could prove I didn't have it anyway.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Beat what out of you? You already gave them a password that decrypts a specific file/volume/etc. If they want to beat you, they will beat you regardless of your possession of any encrypted materials.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

They know it exist as a concept. They can't prove that the specific decrypted message contains a super-secret encrypted message as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Then they better figure out how to block it, I'm not going to assist the nanny-state.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I believe each country should get to have a say in what is permissible, and content deemed unacceptable should be blockable by region.

Agreed. But if I'm running a website, I'm not going to block content based on what some other country that I don't live in wants and why should I?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Yea I suppose the maintenance of those systems provides some employable benefit. So let's say 1000 contractors, is that worth ~500million in tax breaks over 6 years? I'd say absolutely not. If that number were 100x or even 10x maybe, but ultimately it's 500million stolen by the private entities based on exaggerated employment claims and dubious accounting.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Datacenters are absolutely not "job creators." They are necessary for the life we enjoy, they are relatively clean as their major input is electricity and their output is heat. But huge fully functional DCs only need around 20people to run while providing zero local or even state revenue other then property taxes and whatever utility taxes are still applicable to them.

Obviously e-waste is a huge problem, but that is independent of the datacenter itself.

view more: ‹ prev next ›