PeriodicallyPedantic

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

All your criticisms here you could level at AI image/video generation too. Doubly so since art is subjective.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (10 children)

The parallels to film directing are uncanny. Idk why people consider that an art either. Not sarcasm, film directing isn't art for the exact same reason AI images aren't art.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Maybe it does, and that's why they all suck right now lol

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I feel like that applies to most art.
Effort and feeling rarely show in the final piece, because most people aren't good artists and even good artists don't usually produce good art. Even what's "good" here is subjective.

I tend to agree that AI art isn't art in the way that we usually mean it, but also this is turning into a big grey area because people are using AI for touchups and stuff. Mixed media and photomontage artists have a field day I'm sure.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (11 children)

I think what you're describing is more like 3d rendering.

IMO using AI is more like directing in a film. You're not the one creating the art, and the level of control you have is restricted to providing guidance and retrying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That's true! Although many people use makeup to do styling using the default styles... Which is... Not great.

But regardless I think my point still holds, it's not providing instructions for a machine, it's the data the instructions act on. But the difference between data and instructions is a blurry one

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Congratulations, you've learned how memes are created!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I used to think like this, but it's a bit more nuanced./ If you tell people they can't have any expectation of privacy, it's essentially telling people of persecuted minorities that they're not welcome.

Perfect privacy is impossible, but it shouldn't be trivial to violate someone's privacy when their membership of such a community is relevant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Reading it, the latch doesn't deform, the latch sensor deforms. It doesn't allow the closed hood to open, it fails to alert the driver that the hood wasn't closed.

But if the sensor is broken, idk how an OTA can detect that the hood is open.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The problem is a sensor that detects if the latch is closed. How did an OTA fix this?
It hard to tell how big of a concern this was

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I did and it doesn't really give complete answers.

The latch is fine, but the sensor to detect when the driver didn't close the hood can break. I dont understand how an OTA can fix that, and idk how common the problem was, so I can't tell how sensational the headline is

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

Is this a real recall or an OTA update?

I hate Tesla, but a lot of news outlets are like

TESLA RECALLS BAJILLION CARS And what they really mean is they released an OTA update to fix some extremely rare race condition.

The issue is still bad, but I feel like the news outlets are sensationalizing to the point of dishonesty sometimes.

To be clear I'm not sure I understand the actual underlying issue here, so idk how deserved the headline is, but whenever I see them, I'm immediately skeptical

view more: ‹ prev next ›