I think it's a "I don't know what else I was expecting" kind of frown.
Perfide
joined 1 year ago
So your whole point is a slippery slope fallacy. Gotcha.
We have the opposite problem where I live. The auto-flush barely ever works, and more often than not nowadays the manual flush is a tiny button you have to actively search for to find.
I don't think they were trying to downplay the severity. I think they were just pointing out in a snarky way that there were survivors, and thus, we can ask their descendants these questions.
It's the control. If one Native tribe still controlled the ancestral grounds of another tribe, then you probably would have some people calling that out... but they don't. The US government has ALL the control, every tribe within US territory, and all of their land, is at the governments mercy.
No, CSS is the right branch going off the top of the picture. It was originally two feet lower down the main trunk, and used to be growing out of the opposite side.
I haven't skipped any dialogue and I agree with them completely.
Same with 2000 kids. The new millennium started Jan 1st 2001.
Making them unremovable would use more plastic. A lot of people reuse those sports cap bottles.
My local tap water is disgusting. A filter might make it safe to drink, but nothing makes it stop tasting gross. I'll cook with it and drink it with flavoring but I won't just drink it by itself.
This comment, and by extension this meme, is how I found out he died. Oof.
Agreed. Even assuming you know the person wants a pet and can handle a pet, you're still robbing them of choice in what pet they get. The poodle is cute and all, but little timmy really would've preferred a border collie.
Pretty much the only scenario I can agree with gifting a pet is if you know they want one, know they can handle one, and finally when it comes to the actual gift giving, it starts off with a trip to the animal shelter so they can pick their own companion.