OsaErisXero

joined 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think firefox's version works properly? At least, I've not noticed it as an issue since switching back to it from Chrome

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This. Usually we're bitching about the feds just ignoring basic development principles and making shit up as they go along like there wasn't 30 years of hard learned lessons to lean on; this is the first time I can think of where what they're doing actually makes some sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

~~What fresh hell is this~~ Didn't see the Readme link at first pass

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It would not*

*Does not apply in the 5th circuit

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't know where you got that 20% statistic, but everything I've read and can find on short notice has it up around 70%.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Yep, and if they're not behind 10 vpns and a randomly generated username then they're going to get sued into oblivion before close of business Friday

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, i know, but my point was if you were designing a wall material to block 5ghz you would end up with plaster on wire mesh. Couldn't have been better if it were on purpose

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That chicken wire could have been intentionally designed to absorb 5ghz signal, and is death to it. Literally any other material would be fine up to 3 rooms away depending on the noise floor in the space. 6ghz /might/ be able to punch through depending on the width of the space between the wires though, and might be worth exploring in your case.

view more: ‹ prev next ›