And didn't he have a partner who came and did similarly too? Neither managed to kill the guy they had already previously verified had no weapons.
OpenStars
joined 1 year ago
It's a good thing you added "acorn" there!
Uh... the gun has a silencer on it?
While that nut musta been LOUD!
That is extremely nice attention to detail that Pam is wearing a police uniform.:-)
do public companies always have to do what makes the shareholders the most money or risk being sued?
Yes, many details missing in my one-sentence reply, like how the particular contract is worded, but that is the gist. e.g. the board could vote "from now on the position of CEO shall have no power...". But I am no expert in contract law so I don't want to go any deeper than that!:-)
do public companies always have to do what makes the shareholders the most money or risk being sued?
They don't even need to involve an outside party at all: they can just replace the uncooperative CEO at any time for someone else who will play ball.
No?
Oh uh I mean... nope, it's still a no actually. :-P
Your (sic) WRONG!
About EVRRTYHIGN! (sic)
I may know nothing myself, but I still have an opinion and will share it with you, consent be damned!
Why I... [Reddit cap exceeded, please deposit $10 to continue conversation].
Your stipud ! (both sic and /s btw) -> there, now you don't have to go back to Reddit to recall the nostalgia, you are ... welcome, I guess?:-D
It's a common phrase on Lemmy though: we can go lower.
Urg, but then again, just... why!?
The majority of traffic from Elon Musk's X may have been fake during the Super Bowl, report suggests
Which would normally mean that Reddit is not far behind, unless their CEO has the brains to avoid stepping into this same trap. But since it's Huffman, they're screwed! 😆
He's tried. Nobody wants to fuck him:-P.
That's one way to test if he had somehow gained the power to become bulletproof, I suppose. It might have worked better if they could at least aim straight though:-P.