Nighed

Oh look, more really expensive looking electric cars that most can't afford.

I know it makes sense to start at that end of the market, but damn if it isn't annoying.

chrome or firefox?

The page doesn't load in Firefox mobile.... That's about right....

This is a fancy aerospike engine right? The rotating detinations gives it higher chamber pressure and therefore better ISP or something?

I will look for the Scott Manley video on this later (I think it was him?) Edit: also a Real Engineering one that explains the aero-spike nozzle

Anyone have the ISP of this experiment to compare to other engines?

I can't obviously see it there, I do think its a bit stupid, but I would have thought that Toms Hardware wouldn't have bitten the onion? Or have they gone downhill that far?

it always used to be using the windows command to rotate the screen, this will just add a new layer of confusion.

...or as they are using linux it will probably be seen as a good challenge

Your initial comment makes very little sense ( to me anyway)

Their problem has always been with yield not the node size right? They could make the smaller nodes, just not cost effectively?

My bad, app wasn't showing the entire image. I need to try the other apps.

Your title implies they lost all the bad stuff though

Edit: sorry, app didn't show the entire image by default, they DO list exactly what was lost, not a bad email tbh (although better if they didn't lose it)

Isn't it saying that they didn't have those bits so couldn't loose them?

It would have been more useful (but look worse for them!) If they just listed what was lost....

FYI it's 1000 per track per year, not per artist.

I agree though, I went through my instrumental playlist which has loads of indi stuff and the smallest I found had 10,000 plays

Edit - looks like I got a notification for this 4 days late....