Natanael

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The existing legal precedence in most places is that most use of ML doesn't count as human expression and doesn't have copyright protection. You have to have significant control over the creation of the output to have copyright (the easiest workaround is simply manually modifying the ML output and then only releasing the modified version)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Training from scratch and retraining is expensive. Also, they want to avoid training on ML outputs as samples, they want primarily human made works as samples, and after the initial public release of LLMs it has become harder to create large datasets without ML stuff in them

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Unironically yes, sometimes. A lot of the best works which its training samples are based on cites the original poster's qualifications, and this filters into the model where asking for the right qualifications directly can influence it to rely more on high quality input samples when generating its response.

But it's still not perfect, obviously. It doesn't make it stop hallucinating.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
  • uses the same type of armor for females as certain other games, except with realistic defense stats instead
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Any LLM won't have the right architecture to implement that kind of math. They are built specifically to find patterns, even obscure ones, that nobody knows of. They could start flagging random shit indirectly associated with gender like relative timing between jobs or rate of promotions, etc, and you wouldn't even notice it's doing it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

They've just released support for running and subscribing to 3rd party labeling services, I'm sure somebody's going to make a filter for that you can subscribe to

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Blog pingbacks have existed forever but for different purposes

Somebody has actually implemented a Bluesky commenting system too already

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

It's not even properly impermanent because somebody else can just archive everything, ironically giving them better overview than the actual members themselves

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not outdated at all, but you need more words.

See diceware, 7 to 8 words is typically all you need

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

And Motorola had true wireless earbuds earlier, etc.

Apple is about polish, not novelty, but a ton of people are obsessed with the idea of Apple as being "groundbreakers" everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

To support MU-MIMO / beamforming (multipath signals for multiple devices) they could also just add more flat surfaces inside the ceilings to make radio reflections/echoes less complex so that the signal processing doesn't get overwhelmed when the source is some distance away.

Plain absorbing material removes interference but doesn't let you use MIMO tech as effectively, because the newer higher end routers can use those reflections to boost the signal

https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/massive-mimo-and-beamforming-the-signal-processing-behind-the-5g-buzzwords.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I'm pretty sure the problem is the shape and reflections. This type of design creates echoes from many directions which makes it harder to pick up the signal at a distance

view more: ‹ prev next ›