Define "new security measures"
Natanael
joined 2 years ago
But it has to be clearly presented. Consumer law and defamation law has different requirements on disclaimers
In Canada there was a company using an LLM chatbot who had to uphold a claim the bot had made to one of their customers. So there's precedence for forcing companies to take responsibility for what their LLMs says (at least if they're presenting it as trustworthy and representative)
Performance cores versus efficiency cores?
Well, yacy exists
A lot of those exploit EU rules on open markets to dodge proper local licensing (I'm also from Sweden)
There's a million different ways "third party" can go. Sometimes they take the job seriously and have enough mandate to get it done, sometimes they don't. The latter is especially risky and problematic when they're hired by the party accused.
The only way to ensure you get the former is to let somebody not involved in the accusations make the choice of which auditors to hire
Interestingly enough it's the same kind of historical relationship with Russia and Ukraine, where Russia claims rights over Ukraine due to "shared history", when in fact the details of that history supports Ukraine claiming Russia instead.
That won't be a copyright issue, but if you're deliberately making it indistinguishable from somebody else it can be a publicity rights issue by (false) implicit support from the one impersonated.
Before 2010 it was almost exclusively used to refer to cryptography, outside of some even more niche fields (parts of biology, political sciences, etc)
I run /r/crypto on reddit, for cryptography, and the spam is horrendous and the flood of idiots is never ending
They have silently switched stuff on by default before