NaibofTabr

Or just fraud

Yeah but the current build of libvegs has some conflicts with libfruit, so if you need to use both you have to build libvegs in a different directory and then simlink it in /lib.

pics or it didn't happen

I see, so your argument is that because the training data is not stored in the model in its original form, it doesn't count as a copy, and therefore it doesn't constitute intellectual property theft. I had never really understood what the justification for this point of view was, so thanks for that, it's a bit clearer now. It's still wrong, but at least it makes some kind of sense.

If the model "has no memory of training data images", then what effect is it that the images have on the model? Why is the training data necessary, what is its function?

the presentation and materials viewed by 404 Media include leadership saying AI Hub can be used for "clinical or clinical adjacent" tasks, as well as answering questions about hospital policies and billing, writing job descriptions and editing writing, and summarizing electronic medical record excerpts and inputting patients’ personally identifying and protected health information. The demonstration also showed potential capabilities that included “detect pancreas cancer,” and “parse HL7,” a health data standard used to share electronic health records.

Because as everyone knows, LLMs do a great job of getting specific details correct and always produce factually accurate output. I'm sure this will have no long term consequences and benefit all the patients greatly.

We're not talking about a "style", we're talking about producing finished work. The image generation models aren't style guides, they output final images which are produced from the ingestion of other images as training data. The source material might be actual art (or not) but it is generally the product of a real person (because ML ingesting its own products is very much a garbage-in garbage-out system) who is typically not compensated for their work. So again, these generative ML models are ripoff systems, and nothing more. And no, typing in a prompt doesn't count as innovation or creativity.

And what is it you think I don't understand?

Oh this is just nonsense. This isn't "gatekeeping being an artist". You want to be an artist? Great! learn some skills and make some art (you know, your own art, which you make yourself). And yes I know "all art is derivative". That is entirely beside the point.

Machine learning is a vacuum connected to a blender. It ingests information which it combines with statistical analyses and then predicts an output based on an algorithm generated from the statistical model. There is nothing "avant-garde" here because all it can do is regurgitate existing material which it has ingested. There's no inspiration, it can't make anything new, and it can only make any product by ripping off someone else's work.

plagiarism != art

No matter how many artists' work is collected, combined, and regurgitated as algorithm puke, it's still not art and never will be.

Can I ask, why have you settled on this particular idea for a gift if you really don't know what to get?

Also, if you're buying this for someone who loves to cook, they must have some cookware already. What kind of stuff do they have in their kitchen? Do they really need an entire set of cookware, or is there maybe a particular thing that they might appreciate?

Ah, hah, I'm glad you asked, I have thoughts on that too.

Auditing. The government (every government) should employ a team of auditors. In a case like this, the auditors will be attached to the offending company for the purpose of reviewing their operational and financial records. The auditors will be part of (inside of) the company operations for as long as it takes to untangle the details and assess the total sum of revenue gained from the illegal activity, and if that interferes with running the business well that's too effing bad.

While the auditing is ongoing, the company will be responsible for paying the auditors' salaries and expenses, and providing office space and whatever other resources they need. There will also be a representative of the auditors assigned to the executive board, present at all board meetings, with voting and veto privileges. Effectively, the company is on probation and under observation until their debt is paid. Any other violations discovered during the audit will result in additional prosecutions.

If the company finds this too burdensome, or if they have tried to obfuscate their records, then they can simply forfeit the revenue of the entire department/operational area in order to expedite the audit.

however, i know nothing about self hosting. My knowledge is absolutely zero [...] I dont understand nothing

This is going to be a problem, unfortunately. You'll need to define your use case first:

• How much music do you want to have access to? Hundreds, thousands, millions of files? How large is your collection?
• Do you have downloaded copies of all the music you want to listen to? Are they all in one place, well organized and tagged? If you just have downloads in the Spotify app, you won't be able to use those files, you don't actually own that music. You'll need DRM-free audio files.
• Where and how do you want to be able to access them? Just from one device like your phone? Many devices? Is having access at home good enough, or do you want to be able to access your collection while you're away from home?
• Will you be the only user?
• What kind of budget do you have to work with?

An old PC might be enough to act as a server, but there's more involved and the answer to what you need depends on what exactly you want to do. You will not be able to build a personal version of Spotify with just an old PC, for instance.