Also, its free search side-bar AI (also called Bing) is way better and helpful than Google's AI (Bart?) Still, ChatGPT4 is the best tool that I can have access with moderate amount of monthly payment.
MxM111
joined 1 year ago
That's explains my confusion. Thanks!!
You are arguing about terminology use. Please google "controlled hallucinations" to see how people use the term in non-psychiatric way.
a silicon motor that matches the accuracy of quartz-based movements
How do you explain that? If it is still quartz based, then it is the same accuracy. No?
As I understand, healthy people hallucinate all the time, but in different sense, non-psychiatric sense. It is just healthy brain has this extra filter that rejects all hallucinations that do not correspond to the signal coming from reality, that is our brain performs extra checks constantly. But we often get fooled if we do not have checks done correctly. For example, you can think that you saw some animal, while it was just a shade. There is even statement that our perception of the world is “controlled hallucination” because we mostly imagine the world and then best fit it to minimize the error from external stimuli.
Of course, current ANNs do not have such extensive error checking, thus they are more prone to those “hallucinations”. But fundamentally those are very similar to what we have in those “generative suggestions” our brain generates.
You, as a person, can boycott whomever you like, and be loud or silent about it. The law is applied only to companies.
I would not call it “fundamentally” different at all. Compared to, say, regular computer running non-neural network based program, they are quite similar, and have similar properties. They can make a mistake, hallucinate, etc.
Obviously, with so many different AIs, this can not be a factor (a bug).
If you have no problem looking at the image, then AI would not either. After all both you and AI are neural networks.
But the ticking has nothing to do with quartz. One can use quartz oscillator with that silicon motor, for example.
Look at 2 and 3: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hallucination
And I just do not see how that can stigmatize a group of people. It is like saying that the use of the word "headache" in non-medical contexts (e.g., "this homework is a headache") stigmatizes people with migraines. It just does not.